Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Candidate statements/Jayvdb: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008 | Candidate statements Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:20, 18 November 2008 editJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 editsm hack away to suit the tastes of clerks← Previous edit Revision as of 07:20, 19 November 2008 edit undoJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 edits reviseNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==]== ==]==


{{cquote|I went to the ] as a journalist, and returned a cold-blooded revolutionary.|||]|Editors note, '']'' by Douglas Brinkley. ISBN 0747553459, p.xvi.<br/><small>See ] for another apt alternative of this quote.</small>)}} {{cquote|I went to the ] as a journalist, and returned a cold-blooded revolutionary.|||]|Editor's note, '']'' by Douglas Brinkley. ISBN 0747553459, p.xvi.<br/><small>See ] for another apt alternative of this quote.</small>)}}


Hi. My name is John Vandenberg. I have "outed" myself on my userpage. Nothing too exciting, however I feel it is very important that arbitrators are real people. It is not necessary that their real name is known, but it is important that their formal education and experience is known, in order that the community can make informed decisions about who to vote for, and so that people coming to the committee for arbitration can get a feel for the people making the decisions. Hi. My name is John Vandenberg. I have provided a detailed history about myself on ]. I believe that arbitrators should be very open and honest about their formal education and experience in order that the community can make informed decisions about who to vote for, and so that people coming to the committee for arbitration can get a feel for the people that will be making the discussions.


I served as a ] for much of the first half of 2008, and this experience and the termination of it was an eye opener. I am aware of the responsibility, workload and difficulty involved, and still wish to put my name down - more fool me. I served as an ] for much of the first half of 2008. This experience, and the termination of it, was an eye opener. I am aware of the responsibility, workload and difficulty involved. I resigned due to a messy affair, which has since been settled amicably.


My commitments: My commitments:
# I will not edit policy pages or influence policy. This is the responsibility of the community, and arbitrators should not write the policies that they will use in decisions. # I will not edit policy pages or influence policy. This is the responsibility of the community, and arbitrators should not write the policies that they will use in decisions.
# I will oppose any remedy that that is not substantially grounded on existing policy that was written by the community, or on resolutions passed by the Wikimedia Foundation. # I will oppose any remedy that is not substantially grounded in existing policy that was written by the community, or on resolutions passed by the Wikimedia Foundation.
# I will be highly active and available, and will step down and turn in my "access" if I am no longer carrying my share of the load. # I will be highly active and available, or I will step down and turn in my "access".


I will bring to the committee the following: I will bring to the committee:
# ''Broad'' technical skills to automate tasks that the committee regularly performs, and improve processes where possible. # ''Broad'' technical skills to automate tasks that the committee regularly performs, and improve processes where possible.
# ''Broad'' experience and exposure to the culture and leaders of most of the WMF projects # ''Broad'' experience and exposure to the culture, policies and leaders of most of the WMF projects. There are very few arbs, ex-arbs, or other candidates who have measurable experience outside of English Misplaced Pages.
# ''Broad'' language skills - I can only write in English, however I ''enjoy'' working with foreign languages and people who don't have a good grasp of English. # ''Broad'' language skills - I can only write in English, however I ''enjoy'' working with foreign languages and people who don't have a good grasp of English
# ''Limited'' patience for long & drawn out cases. Quick and measured solutions that result in the least amount of pain and disruption are good. ].
# ''Limited'' personal relationships with the elite in the power structure here on Misplaced Pages. It will be rare that I need to be recused.


Whilst on the committee, my mission ''for'' reform within the committee and arbitration process will be to: Whilst on the committee, my mission ''for'' reform within the committee and arbitration process will be to:

Revision as of 07:20, 19 November 2008

Jayvdb

“ I went to the Democratic Convention as a journalist, and returned a cold-blooded revolutionary. ”
— Hunter S. Thompson, Editor's note, Fear and Loathing in America by Douglas Brinkley. ISBN 0747553459, p.xvi.
See Wikiquote for another apt alternative of this quote.)

Hi. My name is John Vandenberg. I have provided a detailed history about myself on my userpage. I believe that arbitrators should be very open and honest about their formal education and experience in order that the community can make informed decisions about who to vote for, and so that people coming to the committee for arbitration can get a feel for the people that will be making the discussions.

I served as an Arbitration Clerk for much of the first half of 2008. This experience, and the termination of it, was an eye opener. I am aware of the responsibility, workload and difficulty involved. I resigned due to a messy affair, which has since been settled amicably.

My commitments:

  1. I will not edit policy pages or influence policy. This is the responsibility of the community, and arbitrators should not write the policies that they will use in decisions.
  2. I will oppose any remedy that is not substantially grounded in existing policy that was written by the community, or on resolutions passed by the Wikimedia Foundation.
  3. I will be highly active and available, or I will step down and turn in my "access".

I will bring to the committee:

  1. Broad technical skills to automate tasks that the committee regularly performs, and improve processes where possible.
  2. Broad experience and exposure to the culture, policies and leaders of most of the WMF projects. There are very few arbs, ex-arbs, or other candidates who have measurable experience outside of English Misplaced Pages.
  3. Broad language skills - I can only write in English, however I enjoy working with foreign languages and people who don't have a good grasp of English
  4. Limited patience for long & drawn out cases. Quick and measured solutions that result in the least amount of pain and disruption are good. Perfect is the enemy of good.
  5. Limited personal relationships with the elite in the power structure here on Misplaced Pages. It will be rare that I need to be recused.

Whilst on the committee, my mission for reform within the committee and arbitration process will be to:

  1. Encourage participatory democracy.
  2. Fire the slackers and the lurkers and people whose term is up.
  3. Require that arbitration cases have a clear scope before they open.
See here for more detailed explanations of these three points.