| Revision as of 15:51, 13 October 2005 editEl Sandifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,527 edits →No Personal Attacks← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:06, 13 October 2005 edit undoNjyoder (talk | contribs)1,197 edits →No Personal AttacksNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::I point out that you specifically ought not be the one to start that poll, by the "do not ruleslawyer" clause in your own personal attack parole. ] 15:51, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | ::I point out that you specifically ought not be the one to start that poll, by the "do not ruleslawyer" clause in your own personal attack parole. ] 15:51, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Creating a survey is not ruleslawyering, it's asking how people feel about a subject. Ruleslawyering only applies to arguing about rules/rule enforcement. It seems to me that the only one ruleslawyering here is you, by trying to apply a policy which obviously doesn't apply and changing the definition of ruleslawyering (and WP:POINT) to apply to something other than arguing about rules/rule enforcement. And there is absolutely nothing in my RfAr that forbids me from starting surveys or that even implies that I shouldn't. | |||
| :This is the second time you've attempted to grasp at straws to find something to "get me" on. First you say it's WP:POINT I'm violating, then you're saying I'm forbidden for making surveys because I was warned against ruleslawyering, even though surveys have ntohing to do with ruleslawyering. If you keep jumping from one random defense to another, it's not going to make your point look any stronger. ] 16:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:06, 13 October 2005
NOTICE: Please do not reply to talk page discussions I've engaged in on article pages on my personal talk page unless I have not replied for a week, the discussion is not related to the article itself or the article is a "high traffic" one that is frequently updated which I haven't replied to for 2 days.
No Personal Attacks
Do not disrupt Misplaced Pages to illustrate a point. If you add that "poll" again, I will block you.
Though feel free to file charges. I haven't been arbcommed in a while. Snowspinner 15:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- This doesn't even come close to violating WP:POINT. Nothing on that page describes what I've done as a violation, no examples or pecedent back up your behavior. It is not a disruption to Misplaced Pages to hold a simple survey. You are clearly abusing your power here.
- For anyone reading this, see this edit where Snowspinner has decided to remove my comments and a survey wholesale from the talk page of Misplaced Pages:NPA. This is the second time he's done this. Nathan J. Yoder 15:21, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- I point out that you specifically ought not be the one to start that poll, by the "do not ruleslawyer" clause in your own personal attack parole. Snowspinner 15:51, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Creating a survey is not ruleslawyering, it's asking how people feel about a subject. Ruleslawyering only applies to arguing about rules/rule enforcement. It seems to me that the only one ruleslawyering here is you, by trying to apply a policy which obviously doesn't apply and changing the definition of ruleslawyering (and WP:POINT) to apply to something other than arguing about rules/rule enforcement. And there is absolutely nothing in my RfAr that forbids me from starting surveys or that even implies that I shouldn't.
- This is the second time you've attempted to grasp at straws to find something to "get me" on. First you say it's WP:POINT I'm violating, then you're saying I'm forbidden for making surveys because I was warned against ruleslawyering, even though surveys have ntohing to do with ruleslawyering. If you keep jumping from one random defense to another, it's not going to make your point look any stronger. Nathan J. Yoder 16:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC)