Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/Casliber: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:36, 4 December 2008 editCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,918 edits →For William M. Connolley: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 17:54, 5 December 2008 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →For William M. Connolley: ConfoozledNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


Erm you've lost me. I don't understand log; G4. If you're watching this page. (I am leaving this here as per your talkpage instructions) Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 23:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Erm you've lost me. I don't understand log; G4. If you're watching this page. (I am leaving this here as per your talkpage instructions) Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 23:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
:I was just going to post the same thing. I checked your log, searched for G4, and found a couple of things, but neither make much sense in context of opposing. Moreover, WMC's oppose is one of the most shocking things I've seen on these votes. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 17:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 5 December 2008

Template:Acecandheader

Edit Analysis

A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Misplaced Pages spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments

LessHeard vanU As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have supported this candidate. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I understand Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Article work

It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us has the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. Kablammo (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the kudos, at least they are nice opposes :) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

For William M. Connolley

Erm you've lost me. I don't understand log; G4. If you're watching this page. (I am leaving this here as per your talkpage instructions) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I was just going to post the same thing. I checked your log, searched for G4, and found a couple of things, but neither make much sense in context of opposing. Moreover, WMC's oppose is one of the most shocking things I've seen on these votes. OrangeMarlin 17:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)