| Revision as of 06:00, 7 December 2008 editCautiousWalk (talk | contribs)9 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:48, 7 December 2008 edit undoDr.K. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers110,824 edits CommentNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == December 2008 == | == December 2008 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Muhammad and slavery|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 05:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Muhammad and slavery|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 05:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :The merging of articles has the prerequisite of putting a merge proposal banner at the head of the article. Hence, enforcing that rule is an activity outside of 'edit warring'.] (]) 06:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | :The merging of articles has the prerequisite of putting a merge proposal banner at the head of the article. Hence, enforcing that rule is an activity outside of 'edit warring'.] (]) 06:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::No it is not. If you read ] you will see that any 3 reversions outside of obvious vandalism qualify for 3RR. Also this article has experienced sockpuppetry, ] activity and block evasion tactics as well as long term edit warring. However since you seem willing to discuss the matter I am willing to ] on your part and not pursue this any further. ] (]) 19:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:48, 7 December 2008
December 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Muhammad and slavery. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dr.K. (logos) 05:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- The merging of articles has the prerequisite of putting a merge proposal banner at the head of the article. Hence, enforcing that rule is an activity outside of 'edit warring'.CautiousWalk (talk) 06:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- No it is not. If you read WP:3RR you will see that any 3 reversions outside of obvious vandalism qualify for 3RR. Also this article has experienced sockpuppetry, WP:SPA activity and block evasion tactics as well as long term edit warring. However since you seem willing to discuss the matter I am willing to assume good faith on your part and not pursue this any further. Dr.K. (logos) 19:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)