| Revision as of 21:25, 29 November 2001 edit200.191.188.xxx (talk)mNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:24, 13 December 2001 edit undoLarry_Sanger (talk) Attributing statistical claims is essential...Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :- also, the statistical estimate of "percent of the population that is gay" has been changed on this page a few times. Can anybody get us a hard cite for a number here? | :- also, the statistical estimate of "percent of the population that is gay" has been changed on this page a few times. Can anybody get us a hard cite for a number here? | ||
| ::Seconding the latter! The best way to counter endless arguments and suspicions about bias is to contextualize assertions by saying such things as, "According to a widely-cited survey by so-and-so, N% of Americans are homosexuals. There have been a number of attempts to estimate the percentage of homosexuals worldwide, such as..." Etc. --] | |||
Revision as of 18:24, 13 December 2001
I'd like to see some references for the anthropological study of homosexuality. It seems to me that every one of the alleged "forms" of homosexuality also exist in heterosexuality. --Dmerrill
My intuition tells me that this article is pro-homosexuality. Was that the author's intent? --Ed Poor
- Who knows. Who cares, as long as it's NPOV.
- - also, the statistical estimate of "percent of the population that is gay" has been changed on this page a few times. Can anybody get us a hard cite for a number here?
- Seconding the latter! The best way to counter endless arguments and suspicions about bias is to contextualize assertions by saying such things as, "According to a widely-cited survey by so-and-so, N% of Americans are homosexuals. There have been a number of attempts to estimate the percentage of homosexuals worldwide, such as..." Etc. --LMS