Misplaced Pages

East Slavic languages: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:18, 1 March 2004 editGenyo (talk | contribs)586 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 03:48, 2 March 2004 edit undoGenyo (talk | contribs)586 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
Current East Slavic languages: ], ], ] and others. Current East Slavic languages: ], ], ] and others.


For politcal reasons, Ukrainian, Belarusian and Russian are considered by some to be dialects of a single language (often identified as Russian) rather than separate languages in their own right. This raises the question of polital vs purely linguistic criterion in the designation of individual languages. Linguists consider each of these three languages to be separate languages in their own right. The languages are somewhat similar, enough to provide a continuum of partial mutual intelligibility over borderland portion of the area of these languages. For politcal reasons, these three separate languages have been considered by some to be dialects of a single language (often identified as Russian) rather than separate languages in their own right. This raises the question of political vs purely linguistic criterion in the designation of individual languages. Linguists consider each of these three languages to be separate languages in their own right. The languages are somewhat similar to one another, enough to provide some partial mutual intelligibility over the borderland portion of the area of these languages.


All these languages use ] ] with minor modifications. All these languages use ] ] with minor modifications.
Line 11: Line 11:
==History== ==History==


The classic genetic schema of the three Eastern Slavic languages is that they each developed separately from a common East Slavic root language. An alternative, more-nuanced view is to posit a predecessor of the modern Ukrainian and Belarusian languages in the language of Old Ruthenian. According to this theory the language to the north, Russian, developed almost exclusively from Old Slavonic, while Ukrainian and Belarusian developed from a common ancestor, Old Ruthenian. The divergence of Old Ruthenian and Russian is evident in the 1100s. The old Ruthenian language then diverges into Belarusian and Ukrainian in the 16-17th centuries. The classic genetic schema of the three Eastern Slavic languages is that they each developed separately from a common East Slavic root language. An alternative, more-nuanced view finds a predecessor of the modern Ukrainian and Belarusian languages in the language of ]. According to this theory, the language to the north, Russian, developed almost exclusively from Old Slavonic, while Ukrainian and Belarusian developed from a common ancestor, Old Ruthenian. The divergence of Old Ruthenian and Russian is evident in the 1100s. The old Ruthenian language then diverges into Belarusian and Ukrainian in the 16-17th centuries. The Russian language then separtaes formOld Slavonic from 1100 to 1700.

Revision as of 03:48, 2 March 2004


Subgroup of Slavic languages, currently spoken in Eastern Europe.

Current East Slavic languages: Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian and others.

For politcal reasons, these three separate languages have been considered by some to be dialects of a single language (often identified as Russian) rather than separate languages in their own right. This raises the question of political vs purely linguistic criterion in the designation of individual languages. Linguists consider each of these three languages to be separate languages in their own right. The languages are somewhat similar to one another, enough to provide some partial mutual intelligibility over the borderland portion of the area of these languages.

All these languages use Cyrillic alphabet with minor modifications.

History

The classic genetic schema of the three Eastern Slavic languages is that they each developed separately from a common East Slavic root language. An alternative, more-nuanced view finds a predecessor of the modern Ukrainian and Belarusian languages in the language of Old Ruthenian. According to this theory, the language to the north, Russian, developed almost exclusively from Old Slavonic, while Ukrainian and Belarusian developed from a common ancestor, Old Ruthenian. The divergence of Old Ruthenian and Russian is evident in the 1100s. The old Ruthenian language then diverges into Belarusian and Ukrainian in the 16-17th centuries. The Russian language then separtaes formOld Slavonic from 1100 to 1700.