| Revision as of 19:00, 22 December 2008 editMacGyverMagic (talk | contribs)44,753 edits →Tim Bowles← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:08, 22 December 2008 edit undoEl Sandifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,527 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Speedy close as keep'''. Querrelous and ] nomination. ] (]) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles}}</ul></div> | ||
| :{{la|Tim Bowles}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Tim Bowles}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 7: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''', after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ]<font color="green">]</font>] 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''', after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ]<font color="green">]</font>] 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Not only is this the 5th nomination of the article, the article also blatantly tells the guy is notable: "He is the executive director of ], and is a Commissioner on the Board of Advisors of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, both Church of Scientology sponsored organizations." That's verifiable. -]|] 19:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Not only is this the 5th nomination of the article, the article also blatantly tells the guy is notable: "He is the executive director of ], and is a Commissioner on the Board of Advisors of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, both Church of Scientology sponsored organizations." That's verifiable. -]|] 19:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 19:08, 22 December 2008
Tim Bowles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy close as keep. Querrelous and pointy nomination. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:- Tim Bowles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Same as with Michelle Stith, no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. *** Crotalus *** 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, querulous re-re-re-renomination - David Gerard (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ←Spidern→ 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Not only is this the 5th nomination of the article, the article also blatantly tells the guy is notable: "He is the executive director of Youth for Human Rights International, and is a Commissioner on the Board of Advisors of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, both Church of Scientology sponsored organizations." That's verifiable. -Mgm| 19:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.