Misplaced Pages

User talk:Caden: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:28, 3 January 2009 editCaden (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,704 edits Undid revision 261633108 by NurseryRhyme (talk)← Previous edit Revision as of 08:39, 3 January 2009 edit undoNurseryRhyme (talk | contribs)2,674 edits {{ANI-notice}}Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
::I agree, that article clearly meets Misplaced Pages's standards, and the delete nomination is sort of silly in my opinion. But let's assume good faith and not accuse the nominator of censorship. It could be that they just misunderstand Misplaced Pages policy, like a lot of people who nominate stuff for deletion. In any case, I think this article will be kept, at least judging by the current consensus. -] (]) 05:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC) ::I agree, that article clearly meets Misplaced Pages's standards, and the delete nomination is sort of silly in my opinion. But let's assume good faith and not accuse the nominator of censorship. It could be that they just misunderstand Misplaced Pages policy, like a lot of people who nominate stuff for deletion. In any case, I think this article will be kept, at least judging by the current consensus. -] (]) 05:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:::I'm sorry Kotra, but I call it like it is. I will not back down from biased editors who use one policy after another to mask their true motives. Assuming good faith can only go so far until you have to face up to the truth. <font face="Verdana">]&nbsp;(])</font> 05:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC) :::I'm sorry Kotra, but I call it like it is. I will not back down from biased editors who use one policy after another to mask their true motives. Assuming good faith can only go so far until you have to face up to the truth. <font face="Verdana">]&nbsp;(])</font> 05:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

{{ANI-notice}} <font family="Arial">]'']''</font> 08:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:39, 3 January 2009

Please look at Robert Eric Wone and see what you think Bachcell (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I had a look at the article on the murder of Robert Eric Wone. The article is well written, well researched and sourced. It should stay. It does not surprise me to see that it's up for deletion though. No doubt the political correct police of Misplaced Pages are behind this nomination for deletion. The truth is, the homosexual community does not want such an article available to the readers because it involves three homosexual suspects who were involved in the violent, brutal rape, and murder of an innocent heterosexual man. This type of censorship happens frequently, not just on Misplaced Pages but also in the liberal mainstream media. It's censorship and should not be tolerated on Misplaced Pages. I believe Wone's murder is a hate crime committed by the three homosexual suspects. Let the truth be known. The facts speak for themselves and sources will back that up. The article must and should remain. The crime is notable enough for the article to be included on Misplaced Pages. Caden S (talk) 04:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I agree, that article clearly meets Misplaced Pages's standards, and the delete nomination is sort of silly in my opinion. But let's assume good faith and not accuse the nominator of censorship. It could be that they just misunderstand Misplaced Pages policy, like a lot of people who nominate stuff for deletion. In any case, I think this article will be kept, at least judging by the current consensus. -kotra (talk) 05:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry Kotra, but I call it like it is. I will not back down from biased editors who use one policy after another to mask their true motives. Assuming good faith can only go so far until you have to face up to the truth. Caden S (talk) 05:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 08:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)