Misplaced Pages

User talk:Aitias/archive 3: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Aitias Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:35, 11 January 2009 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at Lee Myung-bak and gaming: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 08:37, 11 January 2009 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 editsm →Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at Lee Myung-bak and gamingNext edit →
Line 40: Line 40:
== Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at ] and gaming == == Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at ] and gaming ==


Unfortunately, Sennen goroshi's usual stalking and harassment habit seem to be resumed as I have predicted earlier. I somewhat symhasized his block ''again'' , but his retaliation here just reaffirms his intention. The general consensus at ] has criticized his intention and labeled his edits for inserting it as disruptive. As for ], I woud suggest him to check my edits on the articles before making such false accusation ''again''. I did not make even third reverts on that article and took it to its talk page. I have not reverted more than 2 times in 24 hours for over months unlike Sennen goroshi. Besides, the seemingly newbie violated 3RR "twice" regardless of my suggestion and warning to him. I did not even report his first violation from my good faith just like Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at ]. In fact, he vioated 3RR so he earned the block. At that time, I did not report him to AN3 nor to ANI from good faith, but he did not seem to realize your fault. I bring diffs for the evidence on his 3RR vioation. Unfortunately, Sennen goroshi's usual stalking and harassment habit seem to be resumed as I have predicted earlier. I somewhat symhasized his block ''again'' , but his retaliation here just reaffirms his intention. The general consensus at ] has criticized his intention and labeled his edits for inserting it as disruptive. As for ], I woud suggest him to check my edits on the articles before making such false accusation ''again''. I did not make even third reverts on that article and took it to its talk page. I have not reverted more than 2 times in 24 hours for over months unlike Sennen goroshi. Besides, the seemingly newbie violated 3RR "twice" regardless of my suggestion and warning to him. I did not even report his violation from my good faith just like Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at ]. In fact, he vioated 3RR so he earned the block. At that time, I did not report him to AN3 nor to ANI from good faith, but he did not seem to realize your fault. I bring diffs for the evidence on his 3RR vioation.
*1st revert *1st revert
*2nd revert *2nd revert

Revision as of 08:37, 11 January 2009

User talk:Aitias/archive 3/tph

Message from User:Omegamormegil

Please restore the article Vino (Software).Omegamormegil (talk) 02:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, that article has never existed. Thus, I can not restore it. — Aitias // discussion 03:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

request for restoration of article

I would like the following article restored

http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Inheritors_(1980_film)

Respectfully (Jeremy Brosnahan 03:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC))

The article was taken to AfD and other users voted it to be deleted. Versus22 talk 04:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

please restore the page

edit wars - blocking without violating 3rr etc

Hi, I am back from my one week block and very happy to be back.

Following the message you gave me regarding my block, I am starting to understand that the biggest issue is not 3RR, but edit warring..

I would like to draw your attention to the recent edits of Caspian Blue, http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Joseon_Dynasty&action=history

in which he does not violate 3RR, but he makes 3 reverts (due to content dispute, not as he claims in the majority of his revert edit summaries reverting vandalism) in the space of less than one hour - and then stops, to me this is gaming and edit warring. I am sure he thought his edits were right, you may or may not agree with his opinion, but thinking you are right is no excuse for this - I thought I was right with my edits but I was shown the error of my ways.

Considering that he was lucky not to get blocked at the same time as I did, should have shown him that this style of editing is not acceptable - however this does not seem to be the case, and as he has a similar block history to myself I think these actions deserve a block of a similar period to mine.

The reason I am telling you and not just making a report is that you are familiar with the editor in question and perhaps more qualified to take action than an editor who has no knowledge of the above editor.

thanks

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at Lee Myung-bak and gaming

Unfortunately, Sennen goroshi's usual stalking and harassment habit seem to be resumed as I have predicted earlier. I somewhat symhasized his block again , but his retaliation here just reaffirms his intention. The general consensus at WP:BRD has criticized his intention and labeled his edits for inserting it as disruptive. As for Joseon Dynasty, I woud suggest him to check my edits on the articles before making such false accusation again. I did not make even third reverts on that article and took it to its talk page. I have not reverted more than 2 times in 24 hours for over months unlike Sennen goroshi. Besides, the seemingly newbie violated 3RR "twice" regardless of my suggestion and warning to him. I did not even report his violation from my good faith just like Sennen goroshi's 3RR vioation at Lee Myung-bak. In fact, he vioated 3RR so he earned the block. At that time, I did not report him to AN3 nor to ANI from good faith, but he did not seem to realize your fault. I bring diffs for the evidence on his 3RR vioation.

Sennen may argue that the fourth revert is not a revert, but the birth place information in the intro formerly existed. When Sennen goroshi followed me and supported indef.bocked sockpuppeter, Yuan.C.Lee (talk · contribs) to attack me, the artice had "that info" and he clearly particiated in the discussion at the talk. Besides, he reverted 3 times triple at the article regardless of the existent consensus and Blp vioation. I think my good faith on him is really dried up.

Aitias, your blocking him was warrnated because Sennen goroshi violated 3RR, but his message here is another gaming the Wiki system. Could you suggest any solution for me to deal with his constant baiting? Thanks.--Caspian blue 08:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)