Revision as of 06:05, 19 January 2009 editKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits →NewsFight: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:22, 19 January 2009 edit undoCquan (talk | contribs)5,860 edits →NewsFight: speedy deleteNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I maintain that website has no notability: no hits on Google news, no hits on Google that establish notability via independent, verifiable, and in-depth coverage. ] (]) 04:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | I maintain that website has no notability: no hits on Google news, no hits on Google that establish notability via independent, verifiable, and in-depth coverage. ] (]) 04:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. trying to go to newsfight.com finds that it is down or does not exist. Article speaks of it in the past tense. it seems this site has already established its lack of notability. ] (]) 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. trying to go to newsfight.com finds that it is down or does not exist. Article speaks of it in the past tense. it seems this site has already established its lack of notability. ] (]) 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Speedy Delete'''. There is not even an ''assertion'' of notability...so tagged. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 06:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:22, 19 January 2009
NewsFight
- NewsFight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I maintain that website has no notability: no hits on Google news, no hits on Google that establish notability via independent, verifiable, and in-depth coverage. Drmies (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. trying to go to newsfight.com finds that it is down or does not exist. Article speaks of it in the past tense. it seems this site has already established its lack of notability. KleenupKrew (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. There is not even an assertion of notability...so tagged. Cquan 06:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)