Revision as of 05:18, 24 January 2009 editTermer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,543 editsm →NPOV← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:23, 24 January 2009 edit undoRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits commentNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==NPOV== | ==NPOV== | ||
Any article on WP can't be just made out of "cheap jibe" like cited above. At minimum the article should also represent alternative perspectives pr ]. Until it tells just about the "cheap jibe" side of the story, the article is sorry to say, nothing more or less than an example of ].--] (]) 05:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | Any article on WP can't be just made out of "cheap jibe" like cited above. At minimum the article should also represent alternative perspectives pr ]. Until it tells just about the "cheap jibe" side of the story, the article is sorry to say, nothing more or less than an example of ].--] (]) 05:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Can't it? ] is the rebuttal. --] <sup>]</sup> 05:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:23, 24 January 2009
From the Economist article...
After a fortnight in which Estonia's enemies made clever use of the cheap jibe that the country is oozing with nostalgia for the Waffen SS by spelling the country's name as eSStonia, the president's surname as IlveSS and the prime minister's as AnSSip, it is encouraging to see a counter-attack.
--Russavia 01:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
NPOV
Any article on WP can't be just made out of "cheap jibe" like cited above. At minimum the article should also represent alternative perspectives pr WP:NPOV. Until it tells just about the "cheap jibe" side of the story, the article is sorry to say, nothing more or less than an example of WP:TEDIOUS.--Termer (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can't it? Putinjugend is the rebuttal. --Russavia 05:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)