Revision as of 07:44, 28 January 2009 editWuhwuzdat (talk | contribs)56,587 edits Undid revision 266924523 by BBN Chuck (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:45, 28 January 2009 edit undoWuhwuzdat (talk | contribs)56,587 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{sock|Commander beef}} | |||
==Just a question== | ==Just a question== | ||
Did you actually read any of the reasons why your page was deleted? Ah well. Good luck starting your own Misplaced Pages, and have fun. - ] (]) 05:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | Did you actually read any of the reasons why your page was deleted? Ah well. Good luck starting your own Misplaced Pages, and have fun. - ] (]) 05:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:45, 28 January 2009
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Commander beef (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Just a question
Did you actually read any of the reasons why your page was deleted? Ah well. Good luck starting your own Misplaced Pages, and have fun. - Vianello (talk) 05:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spam, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Your page
Re your message: Your article was deleted because your group does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion on Misplaced Pages. It was also advertising, which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. I also strongly suggest that you read the Business' FAQ before recreating the article. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Re your message: The article you created was indeed an advertisement, unlike the three articles that you cited. Please review the guidelines that I listed above. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)