| Revision as of 02:11, 17 January 2002 editTarquin (talk | contribs)14,993 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:31, 5 February 2002 edit undoConversion script (talk | contribs)10 editsm Automated conversionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| We currently have two different ''group'' pages: ] and ]. I suggest simply deleting ] and redirecting it to ]. | We currently have two different ''group'' pages: ] and ]. I suggest simply deleting ] and redirecting it to ]. | ||
| :''Seconded, with one caveat: the title of the final article should be "Mathematical group" to comply with naming standards. --AxelBoldt'' | :''Seconded, with one caveat: the title of the final article should be "Mathematical group" to comply with naming standards. --AxelBoldt'' | ||
| Done. | Done. | ||
| <br>Zundark, 2001-08-11 | <br>Zundark, 2001-08-11 | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| The axiom of closure: | The axiom of closure: | ||
| (Closure) for all a and b in G, a * b belong to G. | (Closure) for all a and b in G, a * b belong to G. | ||
| ⚫ | is superfluous, by definition of a ]. It's worth mentioning that closure follows from the definition, though. | ||
| The test of closure in the examples is in fact a test that the described mapping is inded a binary operation. | |||
| Any thoughts before I wade on in and make changes? | |||
| ⚫ | is superfluous, by definition of a ]. It's worth mentioning that closure follows from the definition, though. | ||
Revision as of 10:31, 5 February 2002
We currently have two different group pages: Mathematical group and Mathematical Group. I suggest simply deleting Mathematical group and redirecting it to Mathematical Group.
- Seconded, with one caveat: the title of the final article should be "Mathematical group" to comply with naming standards. --AxelBoldt
Done.
Zundark, 2001-08-11
The axiom of closure:
(Closure) for all a and b in G, a * b belong to G.
is superfluous, by definition of a binary operation. It's worth mentioning that closure follows from the definition, though.
The test of closure in the examples is in fact a test that the described mapping is inded a binary operation.
Any thoughts before I wade on in and make changes?