| Revision as of 14:20, 8 March 2004 editTkorrovi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,655 edits Restored, *please* discuss, AC is not artificial consciousness if not defined through consciousness, consciousness cannot be defined including to be self-awareness← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:30, 8 March 2004 edit undoPsb777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,362 edits consciousness is not an ability to tell the future - it is self-awareness - do not argue with the dictionaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| An '''artificial consciousness''' (AC) is |
An '''artificial consciousness''' (AC) system is man-made (or otherwise constructed) which is self-aware. This field of study includes research aiming to create and study such systems in order to understand corresponding natural mechanisms. | ||
| Professor ] of ] stated in his book ''Impossible Minds'' (IC Press 1996) that the principles for creating a conscious machine already existed but that it would take forty years to train a machine to understand language. This is a controversial statement given that artificial consciousness is thought by most observers to require ], the possibility of which is denied by some, as a prerequisite. | Professor ] of ], stated in his book ''Impossible Minds'' (IC Press 1996) that the principles for creating a conscious machine already existed but that it would take forty years to train a machine to understand language. This is a controversial statement given that artificial consciousness is thought by most observers to require ], the possibility of which is denied by some, as a prerequisite. | ||
| ==External Link== | ==External Link== | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 8 March 2004
An artificial consciousness (AC) system is man-made (or otherwise constructed) which is self-aware. This field of study includes research aiming to create and study such systems in order to understand corresponding natural mechanisms.
Professor Igor Aleksander of Imperial College, London, stated in his book Impossible Minds (IC Press 1996) that the principles for creating a conscious machine already existed but that it would take forty years to train a machine to understand language. This is a controversial statement given that artificial consciousness is thought by most observers to require Strong AI, the possibility of which is denied by some, as a prerequisite.