| Revision as of 11:53, 5 February 2009 view sourceMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,575 edits closing coldfusion - z0mg none!!!111← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:12, 5 February 2009 view source Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators39,745 edits →Clarifications and other requests: requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/How-to_other_requests}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/How-to_other_requests}} | ||
| {{RfarOpenTasks}}<br style="clear: both;"/> | {{RfarOpenTasks}}<br style="clear: both;"/> | ||
| === Request {to amend prior case | for appeal | for clarification }: ]=== | |||
| ''List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:'' | |||
| *{{admin|Deacon of Pndapetzim}} (initiator) | |||
| *{{admin|Piotrus}} | |||
| <!-- Substitute "admin" for "userlinks" if a user is an administrator. Anyone else affected must be notified that the request has been filed, | |||
| immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. The line for username2 can be removed if no-one else is affected. --> | |||
| ==== Statement by ] ==== | |||
| Sorry, arbs, I'd hoped to see the back of Piotrus 2 and its issues after all the grief it caused. However, a concern has been raised about the attempt of User:Piotrus to close an AN/3 thread in a Polish-Lithuanian dispute nominated by a Lithuanian user (]), in light of his caution in the last Arbitration hearing not to do such things , see ]]. Piotrus "warning" of the Lithuanian user (with whom he has a long history of dispute) was removed from the thread by William Connelly who pointed out Piotrus' involvement, and Piotrus subsequently renewed unsubstantiated accusations against the user (repeeated from ArbEnf) of "harrassing Polish users". Ignoring the serious nature of accusing another established editor of nationality based harassment particularly in light of such allegations being untrue, there is absolutely nothing the patrollers of AE can actually do about this "admin intervention". Piotrus' response to the concerns show such a complete lack of self-awareness about the issues that I'd like the ArbCom to clarify to him and the community whether such action is acceptable in light of the previous caution; and to avoid future occurrences prohibit future ''ad hoc'' "Neutral admin interventions" on behalf of friends/against "enemies" at AN/3. ] (<small>]</small>) 19:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==== Statement by ] ==== | |||
| <!-- Leave this section for others to add additional statements --> | |||
| ==== Clerk notes ==== | |||
| ==== Arbitrator views and discussion ==== | |||
| ---- | |||
Revision as of 19:12, 5 February 2009
- WP:RFAR redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:RfA Review (WP:RREV).
ArbitrationCommittee
| Dispute resolution (Requests) |
|---|
| Tips |
| Content disputes |
| Conduct disputes |
| Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
|---|
 |
| Open proceedings |
| Active sanctions |
| Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
| Track related changes |
A request for arbitration is the last step of dispute resolution for conduct disputes on Misplaced Pages. The Arbitration Committee considers requests to open new cases and review previous decisions. The entire process is governed by the arbitration policy. For information about requesting arbitration, and how cases are accepted and dealt with, please see guide to arbitration.
To request enforcement of previous Arbitration decisions or discretionary sanctions, please do not open a new Arbitration case. Instead, please submit your request to /Requests/Enforcement.
This page transcludes from /Case, /Clarification and Amendment, /Motions, and /Enforcement.
Please make your request in the appropriate section:
- Request a new arbitration case
- Request clarification or amendment of an existing case
- This includes requests to lift sanctions previously imposed
- Request enforcement of a remedy in an existing case
- Arbitrator motions
- Arbitrator-initiated motions, not specific to a current open request
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open cases| Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motions| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Current requests
Clarifications and other requests
ShortcutsPlace requests related to amendments of prior cases, appeals, and clarifications on this page. If the case is ongoing, please use the relevant talk page. Requests for enforcement of past cases should be made at Arbitration enforcement. Requests to clarify general Arbitration matters should be made on the Talk page. To create a new request for arbitration, please go to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration. Place new requests at the top. Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/How-to other requests
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open cases| Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motions| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Request {to amend prior case | for appeal | for clarification }: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2
List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:
- Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (initiator)
- Piotrus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Statement by Deacon of Pndapetzim
Sorry, arbs, I'd hoped to see the back of Piotrus 2 and its issues after all the grief it caused. However, a concern has been raised about the attempt of User:Piotrus to close an AN/3 thread in a Polish-Lithuanian dispute nominated by a Lithuanian user (User:M.K), in light of his caution in the last Arbitration hearing not to do such things , see Arbitration_enforcement#Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes see here]. Piotrus "warning" of the Lithuanian user (with whom he has a long history of dispute) was removed from the thread by William Connelly who pointed out Piotrus' involvement, and Piotrus subsequently renewed unsubstantiated accusations against the user (repeeated from ArbEnf) of "harrassing Polish users". Ignoring the serious nature of accusing another established editor of nationality based harassment particularly in light of such allegations being untrue, there is absolutely nothing the patrollers of AE can actually do about this "admin intervention". Piotrus' response to the concerns show such a complete lack of self-awareness about the issues that I'd like the ArbCom to clarify to him and the community whether such action is acceptable in light of the previous caution; and to avoid future occurrences prohibit future ad hoc "Neutral admin interventions" on behalf of friends/against "enemies" at AN/3. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 19:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Statement by other user
Clerk notes
Arbitrator views and discussion
Category: