Misplaced Pages

Embargo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:57, 22 February 2009 editRadagast83 (talk | contribs)18,709 edits No clear consensus for merger← Previous edit Revision as of 23:01, 29 March 2009 edit undo84.13.210.155 (talk) NotesNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
==Notes== ==Notes==
{{reflist|2}} {{reflist|2}}
not tru


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 23:01, 29 March 2009

This redirect is about the economic term. For press embargoes, see Embargo (journalism). For delayed access after publication, see Embargo (academic publishing).

In international commerce and politics, an embargo is the prohibition of commerce (division of trade) and trade with a certain country, in order to isolate it and to put its government into a difficult internal situation, given that the effects of the embargo are often able to make its economy suffer from the initiative.

The embargo is usually used as a political punishment for some previous disagreed policies or acts, but its economic nature frequently raises doubts about the real interests that the prohibition serves.

One of the most comprehensive attempts at an embargo happened during the Napoleonic Wars. In an attempt to cripple the United Kingdom economically, the Continental System- which forbade European nations from trading with the UK- was created. In practice it was not completely enforceable and was as harmful if not more so to the nations involved than to the British.

The United States had imposed an embargo on Cuban Castro government on February 7,1962.Although the law of the United States does not prohibit participation in an embargo it does prohibit participation in a secondary embargo. This occurs when one country pressures a business to stop doing business with a third country over issues with which the business is not directly involved. Not only is an American business required not to participate in a secondary embargo, but is also required to report all attempts to get a business to participate in a secondary embargo. The situation which led to these laws are attempts by Arab countries to prevent American companies from doing business with Israel and Iraq.

While traditionally considered an act of war, in modern practise this is not necessarily so and an act of embargo is much more complex. The typical reaction is the development of an autarky.


Notes

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/United_States_embargo_against_Cuba
  2. "Blockade as Act of War". Crimes of War Project. Retrieved 2008-10-13.

not tru

See also

Categories: