Misplaced Pages

Tang dynasty in Inner Asia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:22, 26 February 2009 editIkip (talk | contribs)59,234 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:33, 26 February 2009 edit undoEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 edits verifiable material duplicated in existing article -- "Horses in East Asian warfare"Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


{{History of Mongolia}} {{History of Mongolia}}
[[Image:Tang (616-710).png|700px|Left|thumb|
Taizong "reign" 616-649<br />
Colors show the succession of Taizong (Tang) conquest in Asia :<br />
{{Legend|#00005b| ] (617 : his father is governor, Taizong support his revolt.)}}
{{Legend|#000080| Sui's Empire Protector (618). Tang dynasty 618. Controlled all of Sui's China by 622-626.}}
{{Legend|#0000ff| Submit the Oriental Turks territories (630-682)}}
{{Legend|#0080ff| Tibetan's King recognizes China as their emperor<ref>* '']'', vols. ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ].
</ref> (641-670)}}
{{Legend|#78c0ff| Submit the Occidental Turks territories (642-665)}}
<small>(idem) add the Oasis (640-648 : northern Oasis ; 648 : southern Oasis)</small>
{{Legend|#b3d9ff| }}
The two darkest area are the area under the direct control of the Chinese empire, the 3 lightest area are under nominal control and/or vassals. Borders are not factual, they are indicatives.
]]
{{Chinesetext}}
The geographical area known as Mongolia was under Chinese domination in the 7th to 8th centuries. A Proto Mongolic people, the ] were under Chinese rule.


'''Mongolia under Tang rule''' established a foundation for cultural and trading relationships which will continue to evolve for centuries.<ref name="perdue36">Perdue, Peter. (2005). -52.</ref>
The Han Chinese ] conquered a large area of the steppes of Central Asia, Mongolia, and Russia, and forced the ], and the ] and ] into submission and acceptance of Chinese rule. The Han Chinese Emperor ] was crowned ], or heavenly ], after beating the Gokturks and then the Khitan Mongols in Mongolia.<ref>Liu, 81-83</ref><ref>Bai, 230</ref><ref>Xue, 674-675</ref> It is not certain whether the title also appiled to rest of the Tang emperors, since the term ''kaghan'' only refers to males and women had become dominant in the Chinese court after 665 until the year 705. However, we do have two appeal letters from the Turkic hybrid rulers, Ashina Qutluγ Ton Tardu in ], the Yabgu of ], and Yina Tudun Qule in ], the king of ], addressing ] as '''Tian Kehan''' during the ] expansion.<ref>Bai, 230</ref><ref>Xue, 674-675</ref> The Chinese were the first sedentary peoples to conquer the steppes of mongolia, central asia, and russia. They were also the first non altaic peoples to do so.<ref>"The Chinese and their History and Culture" by Kenneth Scott Latouretter FOURTH REVISED EDITION 56892 Library of Congress card number- 64-17372 Printed by Macmillan ISBN 0-8160-2693-9</ref><ref>Liu, 81-83</ref><ref>Bai, 230</ref><ref>Xue, 674-675</ref><ref>Denis C. Twitchett, John K. Fairbank (Hrsg.): The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 3, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1979, ISBN 0-521-21446-7.</ref><ref>Ch.4 : T'ai-tsung (626-49) the Consolidator, p. ~160~170. Author: H.J. Wechsler.</ref> Because of this, the Tang Dynasty was the largest Chinese empire in all Chinese history.
]
In the 7th to 8th centuries, the ] Chinese expanded across large areas of the steppes of Central Asia; but their warfare was not unopposed.


In serial wars of expansion, the Chinese confronted the ] and the proto-] ] and ].
== References ==
{{reflist}}
<references/>


==Tea-for-horses trading system==
==Further Reading==
When the Chinese came in contact with the nomadic tribes of the western steppes, the use of horses in warfare was soon appreciated.<ref>Graff, David Andrew. (2002). </ref> Mounted archers represented an initial tactical advantage over Chinese armies, the Chinese learned to adapt.<ref>Graff, </ref> Conservative forces opposed change, which affected the proportional balance amongst cavalrymen, horse-drawn chariots and infantrymen in Chinese armies.<ref>Ellis, John. (2004). ''Cavalry: The History of Mounted Warfare,'' pp. 19-20.</ref>
* '']'', vols. ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ].
*] et al (2003). ''A History of Chinese Muslim (Vol.2)''. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. ISBN 7-101-02890-X.
*Liu, Yitang (1997). ''Studies of Chinese Western Regions''. Taipei: Cheng Chung Book Company. ISBN 957-091119-0.
* ] (1992). ''A History of Turks''. Beijing: Chinese Social Sciences Press. ISBN 7-5004-0432-8.


Horses and skilled horsemen were often in short supply in agrarian China, and cavalry were a distinct minority in most ] (618–907) armies.<ref>Graff, </ref> The Imperial herds numbered 325,700 horses in 794<ref>Graff, </ref>

The Chinese army lacked a sufficient number of good quality horses. Importation was the only remedy but the only potential suppliers were the steppe-nomads. The strategic factor considered most essential in warfare was controlled exclusively by the merchant-traders of the most likely enemies.<ref name="sinor">Sinor, Denis. ''Oriens Extremus,'' Vol. 19, No. 1-2 (1972), pp. 171-183.</ref>

The Chinese armies came to rely on an officially supervised tea-for-horse trading systems which had evolved over centuries.<ref>Perdue, Peter. (2005). -52.</ref> Tea and horses were so inextricably related that officials repeatedly requested that the tea laws and the horse administration he supervised by the same man. From the perspective of the Chinese court, government control of tea was the first step in the creation of a rational and effective policy aimed at improving the quality of horses in the army."<ref name="sinor"/>

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]

== Notes ==
{{reflist|1}}

==References==
*

*{{loc}} -


] ]

Revision as of 19:33, 26 February 2009

An editor has nominated this article for deletion.
You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion.
Find sources: "Tang dynasty in Inner Asia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FMongolia+during+Tang+rule%5D%5DAFD

Template:Rescue

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template.

(Learn how and when to remove this message)
History of Mongolia
Prehistoric period
Afanasievo culture 3300–2500 BC
Chemurchek culture 2750–1900 BC
Munkhkhairkhan culture 1800–1600 BC
Sagsai culture 1500–1000 BC
Ulaanzuukh culture 1450–1150 BC
Deer stones culture 1400–700 BC
Slab-grave culture 1100–300 BC
Chandman culture 700–300 BC
Pazyryk culture 600–300 BC
Ancient period
Xiongnu 209 BC–93 AD
Xianbei state 93–234
Rouran Khaganate 330–555
Göktürks (First, Eastern, and Second Turkic Khaganates) 555–630
682–744
Xueyantuo 628–646
Tang protectorate 647–682
Uyghur Khaganate 744–840
Liao dynasty 907–1125
Medieval period
Mongol khanates 9th–12th century
Khamag Mongol 1130–1206
Mongol Empire 1206–1368
Yuan dynasty 1271–1368
Northern Yuan 1368–1635
Oirat Confederation 1399–1634
Dzungar Khanate 1634–1757
Qing dynasty 1691–1911
Modern period
National Revolution 1911
Bogd Khaganate 1911–1919
Chinese occupation 1919–1921
People's Revolution (Soviet intervention in Bogd Khanate) 1921
1921–1924
People's Republic 1924–1992
Democratic Revolution 1990
Modern Mongolia 1990–present

Mongolia under Tang rule established a foundation for cultural and trading relationships which will continue to evolve for centuries.

The map of Asia in 800 shows Tang China in relation to its neighbors, including the the Uighur Empire of Mongolia.

In the 7th to 8th centuries, the Tang Dynasty Chinese expanded across large areas of the steppes of Central Asia; but their warfare was not unopposed.

In serial wars of expansion, the Chinese confronted the Mongols and the proto-Mongolic Gokturks and Khitans.

Tea-for-horses trading system

When the Chinese came in contact with the nomadic tribes of the western steppes, the use of horses in warfare was soon appreciated. Mounted archers represented an initial tactical advantage over Chinese armies, the Chinese learned to adapt. Conservative forces opposed change, which affected the proportional balance amongst cavalrymen, horse-drawn chariots and infantrymen in Chinese armies.

Horses and skilled horsemen were often in short supply in agrarian China, and cavalry were a distinct minority in most Tang Dynasty (618–907) armies. The Imperial herds numbered 325,700 horses in 794

The Chinese army lacked a sufficient number of good quality horses. Importation was the only remedy but the only potential suppliers were the steppe-nomads. The strategic factor considered most essential in warfare was controlled exclusively by the merchant-traders of the most likely enemies.

The Chinese armies came to rely on an officially supervised tea-for-horse trading systems which had evolved over centuries. Tea and horses were so inextricably related that officials repeatedly requested that the tea laws and the horse administration he supervised by the same man. From the perspective of the Chinese court, government control of tea was the first step in the creation of a rational and effective policy aimed at improving the quality of horses in the army."

See also

Notes

  1. Perdue, Peter. (2005). China Marches West, pp. 36-52.
  2. Graff, David Andrew. (2002). Medieval Chinese Warfare, 300-900, p. 22.
  3. Graff, p. 28.
  4. Ellis, John. (2004). Cavalry: The History of Mounted Warfare, pp. 19-20.
  5. Graff, p. 176.
  6. Graff, p. 228.
  7. ^ Sinor, Denis. "Horse and Pasture in Inner Asian history," Oriens Extremus, Vol. 19, No. 1-2 (1972), pp. 171-183.
  8. Perdue, Peter. (2005). China Marches West, pp. 36-52.

References

Categories: