| Revision as of 06:45, 5 November 2005 editIdont Havaname (talk | contribs)8,502 edits →No personal attacks!: clarification on which edit summary I was referring to← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:25, 5 November 2005 edit undoDanteferno (talk | contribs)2,428 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| I've tried to be patient with you and would like to continue working with you to make ] a better article, but you're ignoring the rules of this site. Please ], as you have done in your recent edit summaries. Please also read ] and the other pages I mentioned in my most recent message at ]. Also note that the ] states that any editor that reverts an article more than 3 times in a 24-hour period is subject to a temporary block. --] 06:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | I've tried to be patient with you and would like to continue working with you to make ] a better article, but you're ignoring the rules of this site. Please ], as you have done in your recent edit summaries. Please also read ] and the other pages I mentioned in my most recent message at ]. Also note that the ] states that any editor that reverts an article more than 3 times in a 24-hour period is subject to a temporary block. --] 06:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| : The edit summary I was talking about was "Reverted back because children keep changing it without reading it - Sorry i meant Dante". Also, lording your expertise over other users is somewhat of a personal attack, because you're implying that you know more than the rest of us. (You seem like you do know a lot about the subject, but it's best to go by ] and make sure you cite everything.) --] 06:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | : The edit summary I was talking about was "Reverted back because children keep changing it without reading it - Sorry i meant Dante". Also, lording your expertise over other users is somewhat of a personal attack, because you're implying that you know more than the rest of us. (You seem like you do know a lot about the subject, but it's best to go by ] and make sure you cite everything.) --] 06:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| <p> | |||
| == Stop Reverting The ] Page! == | |||
| <p> | |||
| ], ] and myself have asked you a repeated number of times to cite sources. I have, yet you claim one to be discredited in books by ] bands. (]). PROVIDE PROOF of this. You think Lacuna Coil are ] band - PROVIDE PROOF. The longer this is drawn out the quicker one will assume that your edits are based on personal speculation and opinion. --] 14:02, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:25, 5 November 2005
Welcome!
Hi Leyasu! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Idont Havaname 00:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Gothic metal
Before you make sweeping changes to this or any other page that has had some discussion, please ask at the corresponding talk page. It's a good way to avoid being reverted. Also, please read over some of our policies, such as WP:CIVIL and WP:NPOV; otherwise, you might not be able to work well with the other editors. --Idont Havaname 00:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
No personal attacks!
I've tried to be patient with you and would like to continue working with you to make Gothic metal a better article, but you're ignoring the rules of this site. Please stop making personal attacks, as you have done in your recent edit summaries. Please also read Misplaced Pages:Ownership of articles and the other pages I mentioned in my most recent message at Talk:Gothic metal. Also note that the three-revert rule states that any editor that reverts an article more than 3 times in a 24-hour period is subject to a temporary block. --Idont Havaname 06:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
- The edit summary I was talking about was "Reverted back because children keep changing it without reading it - Sorry i meant Dante". Also, lording your expertise over other users is somewhat of a personal attack, because you're implying that you know more than the rest of us. (You seem like you do know a lot about the subject, but it's best to go by this advice and make sure you cite everything.) --Idont Havaname 06:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Stop Reverting The Gothic Metal Page!
Idont Havaname, Ray Dassen and myself have asked you a repeated number of times to cite sources. I have, yet you claim one to be discredited in books by gothic metal bands. (Allmusic.com). PROVIDE PROOF of this. You think Lacuna Coil are nu-metal band - PROVIDE PROOF. The longer this is drawn out the quicker one will assume that your edits are based on personal speculation and opinion. --Danteferno 14:02, 5 November 2005 (UTC)