| Revision as of 09:47, 2 March 2009 editNancy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers23,744 editsm →Re: Please stop: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:03, 2 April 2009 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,094 edits Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppetering. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I have also just made a procedural close your MfD nomination of ] as the article is in mainspace and therefore the appropriate forum for a deletion discussion is ], MfD is for userspace and project space. ]] 09:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | I have also just made a procedural close your MfD nomination of ] as the article is in mainspace and therefore the appropriate forum for a deletion discussion is ], MfD is for userspace and project space. ]] 09:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==] case== | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] 23:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:03, 2 April 2009
Re: Please stop
You know exactly what I am talking about. You have been systematically nominating one editors articles for deletion in an exceedingly pointy fashion. You started with PRODs and moved on to speedies probably only so that you could prevent the article's author removing them. My very best advice to you would be to drop it and move on.
I have also just made a procedural close your MfD nomination of Metod Trobec as the article is in mainspace and therefore the appropriate forum for a deletion discussion is AfD, MfD is for userspace and project space. Nancy 09:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Azviz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. MuZemike 23:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)