| Revision as of 12:49, 18 March 2009 editSoWhy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators62,325 edits →Tagging for speedy deletion: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:40, 18 March 2009 edit undoOrangemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators126,224 edits →Well: As long as you're keeping to that voluntary politics topic ban, I welcome your return to editingNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| I actually meant to re-instate the 1 month block, but it looks like I botched that. How newbish of me... Anyhow, you seem to have come around and if you are willing to accept I think people might be OK with you returning to editing. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 12:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | I actually meant to re-instate the 1 month block, but it looks like I botched that. How newbish of me... Anyhow, you seem to have come around and if you are willing to accept I think people might be OK with you returning to editing. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 12:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :I certainly would have no problem with that. A diversity of opinions is always a healthy condition here! --] | ] 13:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Tagging for speedy deletion == | == Tagging for speedy deletion == | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 18 March 2009
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Home | Talk | About me | Awards | Subpages | Contributions | My ? Page | Voting Record | My Scripts | Useful Links |
The date is: December 29, 2024
Please put your signature on additions to this page.
Well
I actually meant to re-instate the 1 month block, but it looks like I botched that. How newbish of me... Anyhow, you seem to have come around and if you are willing to accept a voluntary politics topic ban I think people might be OK with you returning to editing. –xeno (talk) 12:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I certainly would have no problem with that. A diversity of opinions is always a healthy condition here! --Orange Mike | Talk 13:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi Axmann8. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Gigant Neo, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7 because of the following concern: A7 does not cover animals. Also, the article has multiple claims of notability. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards SoWhy 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)