Revision as of 13:40, 18 March 2009 editOrangemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators126,224 edits →Well: As long as you're keeping to that voluntary politics topic ban, I welcome your return to editing← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:45, 18 March 2009 edit undoOrangemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators126,224 edits →Tagging for speedy deletion: prodded it for youNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
] Hi Axmann8. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for ]. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete ], a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion ] because of the following concern: A7 does not cover animals. Also, the article has multiple claims of notability. Please review ] and especially what is considered ]. In future you should rather tag such pages for ] or start an appropriate ]. Regards ''']]''' 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ] Hi Axmann8. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for ]. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete ], a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion ] because of the following concern: A7 does not cover animals. Also, the article has multiple claims of notability. Please review ] and especially what is considered ]. In future you should rather tag such pages for ] or start an appropriate ]. Regards ''']]''' 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I prodded it for you instead. --] | ] 13:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:45, 18 March 2009
Home | Talk | About me | Awards | Subpages | Contributions | My ? Page | Voting Record | My Scripts | Useful Links |
The date is: December 29, 2024
Please put your signature on additions to this page.
Well
I actually meant to re-instate the 1 month block, but it looks like I botched that. How newbish of me... Anyhow, you seem to have come around and if you are willing to accept a voluntary politics topic ban I think people might be OK with you returning to editing. –xeno (talk) 12:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I certainly would have no problem with that. A diversity of opinions is always a healthy condition here! --Orange Mike | Talk 13:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi Axmann8. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Gigant Neo, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7 because of the following concern: A7 does not cover animals. Also, the article has multiple claims of notability. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards SoWhy 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I prodded it for you instead. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)