Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:47, 1 April 2009

GoneAwayNowAndRetired is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Centralized discussion Village pumps policy tech proposals idea lab WMF misc Voluntary RfAs after resignation Allowing page movers to enable two-factor authentication Rewriting the guideline Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers Should comments made using LLMs or chatbots be discounted or even removed? For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. view edit history watch archive talk purge

User:Rootology/Admin User:Rootology/useful User:Rootology/Pages Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Notes

• User:Rootology/Images
• User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a
• Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style
• Misplaced Pages:Cleanup

to do

• User:TenPoundHammer/Country
• Flatt and Scruggs
• Foggy Mountain Boys
• Soggy Bottom Boys

Misplaced Pages Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Misplaced Pages Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Misplaced Pages in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Misplaced Pages. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Misplaced Pages, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Misplaced Pages in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided - one is April 8 (Wednesday) starting at 6 pm and the other is April 18 (Saturday) starting at 10 am. (Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration.) Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thoughts requested.

Let me know what you think?: User:Tznkai/desk/Stub_protection_of_low_activity_BLPs--Tznkai (talk) 18:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Signpost — 16 March 2009

• News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
• Misplaced Pages in the news: Manufactured scandal, Misplaced Pages assignments, and more
• Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Main page image protection

Could you protect the current DYK image at Commons? Shubinator (talk) 20:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

It's off the Main Page now. Do you think you could occasionally check the DYK queues here and protect any Commons images? That way we don't have to do a temporary upload, which will be better for the servers I'd imagine. Shubinator (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed it. I'll try, but today in spurts aside I'll be lower activity for at least several weeks. If one sneaks by pop it on ANI, and someone can get it quick. rootology (C)(T) 05:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Axmann8

Is he blocked or not? The block log indicates it was set to have already expired, but he says he can't edit. I'm guessing the admin who revised the blocking mis-stated himself. Baseball Bugs carrots 06:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

It seems like he's off the hook now, but I don't know how to do an autoblock. Ask him to post the autoblock #, I think. rootology (C)(T) 06:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Just for your future reference just go to Special:IPBlocklist and either ctrl-F to find the username in the triggered autoblock or click the "autoblock finder" link at the top of the page: http://toolserver.org/~eagle/autoblockfinder.php . cheers, –xeno (talk) 12:43, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Misplaced Pages:HIPPIESCANTBLOCKCONSERVATIVES

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Cerejota (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, Rootology, I deleted that page as an A3, but then I realize who created it. I'm trying to figure out the point of the redirect's name, particularly why such a long string of compounded words would be used to act as a redirect to WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND. If you can come up with a reason, feel free to undelete the article yourself. Thanks, Valley2city 16:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

No worries, it was a bad joke from this thread, from Tarc's comment. rootology (C)(T) 16:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

It got the ax, man. Baseball Bugs carrots 16:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:HIPPIESCANTUNDELETEREDIRECTS rootology (C)(T) 16:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Awesome, dude, another redlink. In the previous comment, I almost said, "it got the ax, dude", but that's the wrong joke and besides I don't use that expression. Or do I?

Oddly enough, on Communistpedia, there are ONLY redlinks. Baseball Bugs carrots 16:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Colours for wlinks on Hippiepedia are pulled randomly from a 16,000 hue database. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:OHNOESEVENTHECOOLESTADMINSCANTMAKEJOKEREDIRECTSWITHOUTEXPECTINGTHEMTOBEDELETEDBYUNSUNSUSPECTINGRCPATROLLERSWITHSOFTRIGGERSONTHECSDTABOFTWLOL also WP:OMGLOOKICANREDLINKTOO--Cerejota (talk) 02:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment just to clear the gigantic redlink of my watchlist.--Tznkai (talk) 04:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Abuse filter idiots guide

My best best would be reading the article about regular expressions and taking it from there. But this is such a potent tool, it's not really smart to allow "idiots" to edit it. I've added a requested filters page instead which would hopefully help a lot. - Mgm| 19:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I know regex. I meant for the mechanics of the tool itself, for what to edit, where, how, and so forth. The on-wiki stuff. rootology (C)(T) 19:55, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Re Steve's RFAR reply

I put in a suggestion for what its worth. rootology (C)(T) 16:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Appreciated. I see the case name has changed. -- FayssalF - 20:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey Rootology, would it be appropriate to show me the content of Talk:Barack Obama/Criticism of Barack Obama so I could fairly assess its bearing on the Arb case. I actually never saw it and only became involved later. If not, I understand, and I wouldn't want to get either of us in trouble. I would however, encourage you to bring this up with the arbitrators like Fayssal, as it seems only fair that those who are clueless here get a fair chance to assess the entirety of the situation. Grsz 21:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

For anything else (subject to BLP/sensitive data etc) I'd be fine with it, but not for Obama stuff. I don't do anything tools-wise there. Looks like Matt is clerking this one, I was going to ask him after it opened for a staging copy somehow that we could use for evidence in a public fashion (with NOINDEX on it of course). rootology (C)(T) 22:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I think it's an important piece of evidence that shouldn't just be restricted to helping admins. Thanks for the reply, Grsz 22:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Well I'm not actually due up in the rotation yet, so I'll ping the list and see who is clerking it. Also, I'll ask about restoring this page. MBisanz 22:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Matt. Grsz 22:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok, talked to the other clerks. If/when the case open, I or another clerk will copy and paste the largest version of that page to the evidence talk page for others to review. MBisanz 23:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Will it include edit histories, for who added what? rootology (C)(T) 23:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

It has 5 edits total to it, and there are only 2 editors, one who added all the content and one who added a link formatting at top. Is this the right page? MBisanz 23:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I think so. Let me ping Wikidemon to look here, just in case. rootology (C)(T) 23:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

It should have been edited by User:Stevertigo, per his admission here. Grsz 23:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

WND

Hang on about WorldNetDaily, I'm working on it at the moment. Thanks. :) TheAE talk/sign 15:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I removed "right-wing" again, but left "conservative" with the sources. From what I see, they are used for the same meaning, so it is overkill. Thanks for finding the sources. :) TheAE talk/sign 15:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I undid you. :( Rightwing and conservative are two different concepts. Let's take it to the article talk. rootology (C)(T) 15:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

*shrug* I undid you again. :P Actually, I didn't undo that (and I replied on the talk page regarding it). I partially undid it (leaving right-wing), but only because I had worked on it further (especially with the refs, and also the title & website name). If you want to reply on it, that's fine, but I'm willing to let it go. :) Good to meet you, though (too bad it was over edit-warring... :P). TheAE talk/sign 16:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 18:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Signpost: 23 March 2009

• From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
• Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
• News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
• Misplaced Pages in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Happy GoneAwayNowAndRetired's Day!

GoneAwayNowAndRetired has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as GoneAwayNowAndRetired's Day! For being an excellent user who is dedicated to the English Misplaced Pages, enjoy being the star of the day, dear GoneAwayNowAndRetired! Signed, →Dyl@n620

For being an extremely knowledgeable, sensible, helpful, and active admin, and valuable content editor, I hereby declare that today (March 26, 2009) is your day. Enjoy! :D →Dyl@n620 00:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Fort Lawton Riot and book promotion

It appears that Jack Hamann, or someone impersonating him, is using the Fort Lawton Riot article to help promote his book . I'm going to go fix the article and leave a note on his talk page but wanted to make you, an admin with some prior familiarity of the article, aware of the situation in advance in case it blows up into anything. Cla68 (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Signpost: 30 March 2009

• From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
• Special report: Community weighs license update
• News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
• Misplaced Pages in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

jimbo wales

The page you requested to be deleted is Jimbo's personal user page! An IP address saved it from deletion. Please do not abuse Twinkle in this way. Griffinofwales (talk) 02:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Inclusionists be first against the wall when the glorious April Revolution come! rootology :  Chat  02:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't care if it is April Fool's or not, but I intend to keep WP as safe as possible from people like you. Please do not add unconstructive edits to WP. Thank You. Griffinofwales (talk) 03:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

"People like you", eh? While we're being uncivil and templating the regulars, GRINCH!!!! Wikidemon (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh yes, we all need protecting from the evil that is Rootology. You know, once you learn that he's the opposite of Squaretology, he's not so scary. --Deskana, Champion of the Frozen Wastes 03:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ipatrol (talk) 03:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh god... –Juliancolton |  03:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

There's always one. --Deskana, Champion of the Frozen Wastes 03:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Jimbo Wales

The MfD nomination is harmless enough, but the message at User:Jimbo Wales is borderline. That page is widely viewed by members of the general public, most of whom will not get the joke (and might mistake this for a serious issue regarding Jimbo).
I decided not to remove the message myself (as I realize that the community needs to have some fun), but I strongly believe that it's a bad idea to edit-war for the purpose of reinserting a prank that a user in good standing deemed inappropriate. Rather than reverting again, please consider settling for the talk page notice and the MfD page itself. Thank you. —David Levy 03:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm at a 1RR on that page, it's fair game for whomever. It was either this, or an usurp request to rename myself User:Grawp. :) rootology :  Chat  03:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah, we made need a Checkuser and a SPI, too ;) Cheers, Jack Merridew 03:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

You

If your AFD joke does not earn a block it is just not good enough. Why, I think I'll create some sock accounts to add conspiracy theories to a few featured articles.Wikidemon (talk) 03:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

GoneAwayNowAndRetired (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It was a ] and setup. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It was a ] and setup. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It was a ] and setup. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock