| Revision as of 18:08, 13 November 2005 editElectionworld (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,563 edits →Centre Party's ideological positioning← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:19, 14 November 2005 edit undoConstanz (talk | contribs)4,319 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| I added infobox as it helps to bring forth more important facts. Although incomplete (I had created the 'Estonia Poltical Party' template just minutes before), I still regard somewhat necessary to keep it for the the others might contribute to this sphere. | I added infobox as it helps to bring forth more important facts. Although incomplete (I had created the 'Estonia Poltical Party' template just minutes before), I still regard somewhat necessary to keep it for the the others might contribute to this sphere. | ||
| OK, let this 'liberalism' be maintained, although I myself object to calling our Centre Party a liberal party in whatever respect. As far as I know, European liberalism (especially social liberalism) is quite pro-EU (europhile), our Centrist Party on the other hand was the only party amongst our main political parties to call voters to reject EU membership. The word liberal sounds weird concerning party leader's authoritarian tendecies, too. ] 15:19, 14 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:19, 14 November 2005
Centre Party's ideological positioning
It should be noted that our Centre Party is not 'centrist' (also its leaders have supposed to be) in way the centrist parties in the Nordic countries are. Its name dates back to the beginning of 1990s when Edgar Savisaar was the leader of moderate wing of Estonian independence movement. Independence movement's radical wing consisted of parties that later formed Fatherland Union and Estonian National Independence Party. Savisaar's party that grew out of Popular Front was at that time correctly named Centrist Party as it took more moderate stance compared with conservatives and christian democtrats lead by later prime minister Mart Laar. In later years, in opposition to right wing governemts Savisaar's party turned out to become the champion of pensioners and other not so well-up people, so in fact it has represented social democratic views in many respects. From the beginning of 1990s up to 1995 and now again from 2003 on there has also been Social Democratic Party in Estonia. It was first formed by some members of Popular Front probably not happy with Savisaar's authoritarian tendencies and his distaste for more radical pro-independence politicians. Marju Lauristin was one of the leading members of social democrats this time. She chose the line of compromise between moderates and radical and later her Social Democratic Party which was quite small at the time joined M.Laar's reformist government. Later, as the support of SDP diminished, it fused with some other centrist and centre right parties and therefore actually never played a role of left wing party in Estonia. Savisaar's Centre Party on the other hand has enyoied very high ratings of popularity and good election result as it has been voted by more poor people discontent with shock therapy and later neo-liberal policies by successive right wing governments.
To Electionworld: I suggest mentioning 'Centrism' as CP's official ideology. According to real politics the party is usually considered by Estonians the most left wing party among the six parties represented in Riigikogu. I suggest that we exclude the label 'social liberal' as 'social democratic' already includes both more centrist (i.e social liberal) tendencies as well as left-leaning politics.
- Social democracy and social liberalism are not one and the same. You don't need to be a social democrat to be left-wing. The party's website describes its position as centrist and liberal. So I really prefer to have social liberalism in. BTW could you please sign your remarks. Electionworld 18:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
I added infobox as it helps to bring forth more important facts. Although incomplete (I had created the 'Estonia Poltical Party' template just minutes before), I still regard somewhat necessary to keep it for the the others might contribute to this sphere.
OK, let this 'liberalism' be maintained, although I myself object to calling our Centre Party a liberal party in whatever respect. As far as I know, European liberalism (especially social liberalism) is quite pro-EU (europhile), our Centrist Party on the other hand was the only party amongst our main political parties to call voters to reject EU membership. The word liberal sounds weird concerning party leader's authoritarian tendecies, too. Constanz 15:19, 14 November 2005 (UTC)