| Revision as of 01:07, 19 March 2004 editJiang (talk | contribs)43,437 editsm Reverted edits by Calmypal to last version by Seth Ilys← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:09, 19 March 2004 edit undoCalmypal (talk | contribs)2,484 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :I think that for things which come in chronological order (like U.S. presidents), the succession box should be used. For relatively short, absolutely-set lists of items, the listbox is occasionally acceptable. - ] 01:05, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC) | :I think that for things which come in chronological order (like U.S. presidents), the succession box should be used. For relatively short, absolutely-set lists of items, the listbox is occasionally acceptable. - ] 01:05, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC) | ||
| :Don't remove comments that were not your own or attributed to you, Jiang. "Absolutely-set"? Why is this? - ] 01:09, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:09, 19 March 2004
I guarantee you the "8 Others" by tomorrow. - Misplaced Pages 23:18, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Hm, that was fast... - Misplaced Pages 23:25, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
This table is ridiculous. Footers are not replacements for lists. Now we can't easily navigate from president to president. I will revert if i find no good reason to keep. --Jiang 00:12, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
What exactly do you mean? If I can't make sense of a question, how can I answer? - Misplaced Pages 00:23, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I agree with Jiang, I don't really like it either, although I tried to clean it up. It's incredibly crowded, and it replaces the standard incumbent table. There's no real reason to leap from Eisenhower to John Quincy Adams, there is a reason to go from Eisenhower to Kennedy. Also, why is your username written as Misplaced Pages? That seems kind of sneaky. jengod 00:35, Mar 19, 2004 (UTC)
I'll write my name however I want! Is there a reason to jump from Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban to Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets? Is there really a reason to jump from Arizona to the U.S. Virgin Islands? - Misplaced Pages 00:39, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Grover Cleveland should be put in once for each term to show chronological order. - Misplaced Pages 00:43, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- A fact that used to be indicated by the incumbent table. I think this should have been discussed on Talk:President of the United States before you unilaterally decided to "update" the president pages. jengod 00:46, Mar 19, 2004 (UTC)
Is this really such a big change? I'm adding information and that is all! I'm not removing or changing anything, I'm just linking each president to every other president! - Calmypal 01:01, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
You are making a stupid change. Harry Potter only has a few items. The Virgin Islands and Arizona have no clear chronological order. The presidents do. --Jiang
- I think that for things which come in chronological order (like U.S. presidents), the succession box should be used. For relatively short, absolutely-set lists of items, the listbox is occasionally acceptable. - Seth Ilys 01:05, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Don't remove comments that were not your own or attributed to you, Jiang. "Absolutely-set"? Why is this? - Woodrow 01:09, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)