| Revision as of 14:11, 10 April 2009 editKuyabribri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,947 edits →Major revert: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:00, 15 May 2009 edit undoKuyabribri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,947 edits replaced forum discussion with talk page headerNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{talkpageheader}} | |||
| Is LPI a scam? | |||
| It is not a government endorsed test, it is unregulated, and not used by all Post-Secondary Institute. | |||
| No, it's not. ] 07:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Oh really! Who gives them the right to judge rather a student is proficient or not? | |||
| == Major revert == | == Major revert == | ||
Revision as of 16:00, 15 May 2009
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Language Proficiency Index article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Major revert
I have reverted a substantial amount of content on this page added by Lpi-english (talk · contribs) and an IP user from Vancouver, BC that was an unencyclopedic, uncited, POV essay. Please do not re-add without citations from reliable sources. KuyaBriBri 14:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)