Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Elysian Space Navy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:25, 14 April 2009 editJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits Elysian Space Navy: +del, tidy← Previous edit Revision as of 07:42, 14 April 2009 edit undoSephiroth BCR (talk | contribs)25,432 edits Elysian Space Navy: deleteNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Delete'''. Speaking as a fan of this series, this content is not even remotely relevant. If there's somewhere a stub could be merged to, consider that, but I don't think it's necessary. ] (]) 18:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Speaking as a fan of this series, this content is not even remotely relevant. If there's somewhere a stub could be merged to, consider that, but I don't think it's necessary. ] (]) 18:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' — Beyond the lede, which is surely stated elsewhere, this is an indiscriminate list. This whole lot is unsourced beside fanish-sites. Our whole walled-garden of Honorcruft is an unencyclopædic mess that is more appropriate for a ]. Cheers, ] 05:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' — Beyond the lede, which is surely stated elsewhere, this is an indiscriminate list. This whole lot is unsourced beside fanish-sites. Our whole walled-garden of Honorcruft is an unencyclopædic mess that is more appropriate for a ]. Cheers, ] 05:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No notability asserted, completely fails ]. — <font face="Segoe Script">]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''(])'''</sup></font> 07:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:42, 14 April 2009

Elysian Space Navy

Elysian Space Navy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Entirely in-universe trivia and plot summary. Apparently, removing lists of make-believe orders of battle and damage counts as "gutting and destruction" -- if such trivia is so essential, probably the entirety of the article can be excised. "Real world" informaiton is grammatically incoherent speculation and original research. Beyond that, this article merely regurgitates a section of plot across two books; per previous AfDs at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Second battle of Hogwarts and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Battle of Hogwarts (2nd nomination), and AfD-less consensus for Battle of Yavin IV and Battle of Endor, this content is unnecessary. So, to sum up, this article fails WP:PLOT, WP:IINFO, WP:RS, WP:GNG. --EEMIV (talk) 19:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Categories: