Revision as of 18:04, 22 November 2005 editReddi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users58,350 edits move up comment with others ... strike out← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:41, 22 November 2005 edit undoArt Carlson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,350 edits →Talk:Plasma cosmologyNext edit → | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
: ''I will 'deny' discuss request on edits with trolls'' .... I may discuss it with other editors that are not "apologists" (such as Joker and Joshua) or evanglists for whatever viewpoint they hold (which may include you, Art ... but I have not had much interaction with you) and I ''have'' lost faith with the other editor, '''primarily because of personal attacks thrust upon me by the editor (and other violations of the ''Writers' rules of engagement'')'''. He has also gone out of his way to work against a consensus. I ''try not'' to ''revert the same page more than three times on the same day'', but there is nothing "heavy" about that ... and this is clearly within the acceptable policies of Misplaced Pages. Sincerely, ] 15:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | : ''I will 'deny' discuss request on edits with trolls'' .... I may discuss it with other editors that are not "apologists" (such as Joker and Joshua) or evanglists for whatever viewpoint they hold (which may include you, Art ... but I have not had much interaction with you) and I ''have'' lost faith with the other editor, '''primarily because of personal attacks thrust upon me by the editor (and other violations of the ''Writers' rules of engagement'')'''. He has also gone out of his way to work against a consensus. I ''try not'' to ''revert the same page more than three times on the same day'', but there is nothing "heavy" about that ... and this is clearly within the acceptable policies of Misplaced Pages. Sincerely, ] 15:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
::Since you have not had much interaction with me, I have given you no reason to think I am a troll, an apologist, of an evangelist. I think Joshua's latest edits and his justification of them are reasonable. If you have personal problems with him, them I would ask you to consider the edits and comments to be mine and to respond to them under the Wiki assumption of good faith. My primary objection to your behavior is not the three reverts, but your not explaining them on the Talk page. --] 18:41, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
<strike>:I am considering a User:RfC against you for your conduct with regards to this matter. Art Carlson will let me know shortly. You can avoid this simply by responding on the ] page. Thanks, --] 20:58, 21 November 2005 (UTC) | <strike>:I am considering a User:RfC against you for your conduct with regards to this matter. Art Carlson will let me know shortly. You can avoid this simply by responding on the ] page. Thanks, --] 20:58, 21 November 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:41, 22 November 2005
I am intermittently inactive. | ||
NOTE: Status is currently offline for the foreseeable future. Comments may not be answered in short order. This does not imply the violation of any of the Misplaced Pages policies. I sign on infrequently.
I currently access wikipedia through various friends and public sources. I will be on from time to time ... just adding content. Any and all criticism, comment, and feedback welcomed. JDR 18:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC) |
From time to time I'll respond here and delete the
old content; I'll leave them for a few weeks (mostly). JDR 18:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Past discussion can be seen through the History page
Responses
Thanks for the all comments ...
Talk:Plasma cosmology
Please explain your recent revert in terms of the edits that were explained on the page. Thank you. --Joshuaschroeder 20:06, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
"Please do not feed the trolls". JDR 20:18, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Three reverts without making an appearance on the Talk page is heavy stuff. Can you explain yourself? --Art Carlson 21:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
- I will 'deny' discuss request on edits with trolls .... I may discuss it with other editors that are not "apologists" (such as Joker and Joshua) or evanglists for whatever viewpoint they hold (which may include you, Art ... but I have not had much interaction with you) and I have lost faith with the other editor, primarily because of personal attacks thrust upon me by the editor (and other violations of the Writers' rules of engagement). He has also gone out of his way to work against a consensus. I try not to revert the same page more than three times on the same day, but there is nothing "heavy" about that ... and this is clearly within the acceptable policies of Misplaced Pages. Sincerely, JDR 15:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Since you have not had much interaction with me, I have given you no reason to think I am a troll, an apologist, of an evangelist. I think Joshua's latest edits and his justification of them are reasonable. If you have personal problems with him, them I would ask you to consider the edits and comments to be mine and to respond to them under the Wiki assumption of good faith. My primary objection to your behavior is not the three reverts, but your not explaining them on the Talk page. --Art Carlson 18:41, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
:I am considering a User:RfC against you for your conduct with regards to this matter. Art Carlson will let me know shortly. You can avoid this simply by responding on the Talk:Plasma cosmology page. Thanks, --Joshuaschroeder 20:58, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Please respond to your RfC here Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Reddi. Thanks, Joshuaschroeder 22:18, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi, Reddi. I have begun the process of arbitration since you have made it clear you will not engage me. You can read about it here: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration. Thanks, --Joshuaschroeder 18:00, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
User:Elerner RfC
I have added a request for comment on Eric Lerner's editing, at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Elerner. You may want to look at it if you have a spare moment, since your views are probably quite different from mine. –Joke137 00:46, 22 November 2005 (UTC)