| Revision as of 21:47, 22 November 2005 editSdedeo (talk | contribs)5,246 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:17, 27 November 2005 edit undoSplash (talk | contribs)33,425 edits link to AfDNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ] 21:47, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | ] 21:47, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Articles for Deletion debate== | |||
| This article survived an ] debate. The discussion can be found ]. -]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 18:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:17, 27 November 2005
Where is the dispute? This is all an invention by Duncharris and should be ignored until he has some proof.--Big Lover 20:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- The dispute, Gastrich under a pseudonym, is if this is really worthy of being an encyclopeia article. This is not an invention by Duncharris, it's an invention by you. Harvestdancer 16:46, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
accrediting
A few things:
1. LBU claims that they are listed in the directory, but they are not listed in the directory. I have changed the article to reflect this.
2. AACTS has no status with any federal agency. Whether or not it "desires" any status with any federal agency is their business. You can put it in the AACTS article if you like. If you can provide a source from AACTS saying they have not attempted to secure status with the government, then go ahead and put it in.
Sdedeo 21:47, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Articles for Deletion debate
This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 18:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)