Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009 editSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:43, 19 May 2009 edit undoTiptoety (talk | contribs)47,300 edits EndorseNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
;CheckUser requests | ;CheckUser requests | ||
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | |
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | Endorse }} <small>Requested by — ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC) </small> | ||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | <!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | ||
<!--## Codeletters are: | <!--## Codeletters are: | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run --> | F - Other, please explain why a check should be run --> | ||
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> | <!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> | ||
CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | *CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
*{{Endorse}} - ] <sup>]</sup> 23:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments | ;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments |
Revision as of 23:43, 19 May 2009
Caden
Caden (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden/Archive.
Report date May 19 2009, 22:39 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Corpiestre (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
This user shows up out of nowhere and starts defending the suspected sock master, who was previously blocked today, for a day.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Evidence submitted by Daedalus969
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by — Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk endorsed - Tiptoety 23:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions
Categories: