| Revision as of 20:14, 23 May 2009 editDavidBoothroyd (talk | contribs)22 edits →David Boothroyd← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:19, 23 May 2009 edit undoOttava Rima (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,327 edits →David BoothroydNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * '''Comment'''. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. ] (]) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | * '''Comment'''. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. ] (]) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. ] (]) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:19, 23 May 2009
David Boothroyd
AfDs for this article:- David Boothroyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a WP:BLP. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. rootology/equality 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the subject wants it that way. Syn 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. Nathan 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. DavidBoothroyd (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)