| Revision as of 20:47, 23 May 2009 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits Delete: notability and subject request.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:50, 23 May 2009 edit undoJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits noteNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| * '''Delete'''; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's that the article be removed. ] 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | * '''Delete'''; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's that the article be removed. ] 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| I have taken the step of applying ] rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Misplaced Pages. It has no references at all, is a biography of a living person, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Now, I need to find the right templates for archiving this. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:50, 23 May 2009
David Boothroyd
AfDs for this article:- David Boothroyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a WP:BLP. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. rootology/equality 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the subject wants it that way. Syn 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. Nathan 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. DavidBoothroyd (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Conti|✉ 20:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's request that the article be removed. AGK 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I have taken the step of applying WP:SNOW rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Misplaced Pages. It has no references at all, is a biography of a living person, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Now, I need to find the right templates for archiving this. Jehochman 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Categories: