| Revision as of 02:28, 8 June 2009 editBeno1000 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers3,659 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:15, 22 June 2009 edit undoNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,775 editsm →Claims: clean up of excessive links to common words understood by most readers.Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Grossman's theory, based on the World War Two research of ], is that most of the ] deeply resists killing another human. | Grossman's theory, based on the World War Two research of ], is that most of the ] deeply resists killing another human. | ||
| Modern |
Modern military training allegedly overrides this instinct, by: | ||
| * using man-shaped targets instead of bulls-eye targets | * using man-shaped targets instead of bulls-eye targets | ||
| * practicing and drilling how soldiers would actually fight | * practicing and drilling how soldiers would actually fight | ||
| * dispersing responsibility for the killing throughout the group | * dispersing responsibility for the killing throughout the group | ||
| * displacing ] for the killing onto an |
* displacing ] for the killing onto an authority figure, i.e. the commanding officer and the military ]. (See the ]) | ||
| * By the time of the |
* By the time of the United States involvement in the ], says Grossman, 90 percent of U.S. soldiers would fire their weapons at other people. | ||
| * The act of killing is |
* The act of killing is psychologically traumatic for the killer, even more so than constant danger or witnessing the death of others. | ||
| Grossman further argues that |
Grossman further argues that violence in television, movies and video games contributes to real-life violence by a similar process of training and desensitization. | ||
| In '']'' (Grossman's sequel to '']'', based on ten years of additional research and interviews) he addresses the |
In '']'' (Grossman's sequel to '']'', based on ten years of additional research and interviews) he addresses the psychology and physiology of human aggression. | ||
| == External links == | == External links == | ||
Revision as of 14:15, 22 June 2009
 | This article may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. Please add more reliable sources to establish its current use and the impact the term has had on its field. Otherwise consider renaming or deleting the article. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Killology is a neologism which attempts to define the study of the psychological and physiological effects of combat on humans. The term was invented by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman ret. of the Killology Research Group in his 1995 book On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society.
Claims
Grossman's theory, based on the World War Two research of S.L.A. Marshall, is that most of the population deeply resists killing another human.
Modern military training allegedly overrides this instinct, by:
- using man-shaped targets instead of bulls-eye targets
- practicing and drilling how soldiers would actually fight
- dispersing responsibility for the killing throughout the group
- displacing responsibility for the killing onto an authority figure, i.e. the commanding officer and the military hierarchy. (See the Milgram experiment)
- By the time of the United States involvement in the Vietnam War, says Grossman, 90 percent of U.S. soldiers would fire their weapons at other people.
- The act of killing is psychologically traumatic for the killer, even more so than constant danger or witnessing the death of others.
Grossman further argues that violence in television, movies and video games contributes to real-life violence by a similar process of training and desensitization.
In On Combat (Grossman's sequel to On Killing, based on ten years of additional research and interviews) he addresses the psychology and physiology of human aggression.
External links
- Killology.com
- List of articles and texts from predominantly use-of-force agents (police or military)