| Revision as of 13:11, 10 June 2009 editVerbal (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 edits →Telepathy and war: r and advice← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:41, 10 June 2009 edit undoFrei Hans (talk | contribs)743 edits →Telepathy and warNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| In reverting my recent edit (placing the same text elsewhere is still a revert) and removing a tag you have gone well beyond the limits of ]. I suggest you stop, else you will be justifiably blocked (note I haven't reported you for this, as I'm extending ].) ] <small>]</small> 11:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | In reverting my recent edit (placing the same text elsewhere is still a revert) and removing a tag you have gone well beyond the limits of ]. I suggest you stop, else you will be justifiably blocked (note I haven't reported you for this, as I'm extending ].) ] <small>]</small> 11:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Replacing text in a different place can alter the tone of an article. As the content refers to other Misplaced Pages content and is relevant to the section, and as I am aiming for a neutral tone, I thought you might prefer it where I put it. If you continue to accuse me of making |
:Replacing text in a different place can alter the tone of an article. As the content refers to other Misplaced Pages content and is relevant to the section, and as I am aiming for a neutral tone, I thought you might prefer it where I put it. If you continue to accuse me of making unreasonable edits, while expecting that you yourself can "justifiably" remove large blocks of cited and referenced text, then perhaps Misplaced Pages is not the place for you. Why not start an article yourself, have a go at citing and referencing it, and then ask me for feedback. ] (]) 12:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :: The rules governing ] are clear. The reintroduction of the text I removed, even in a different place, is a revert. It might not have been considered a revert had you added a ], but you didn't. Going by the AfD the page will shortly be deleted anyway, and I haven't accused you of what you say. If you continue to make accusations against good faith you may well be reported to ], and further reverts will lead to a block. You have ignored lots of good advice, and continue to edit against wikipedia policies (] in particular). Have a look at ] and ]. ] <small>]</small> 13:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | :: The rules governing ] are clear. The reintroduction of the text I removed, even in a different place, is a revert. It might not have been considered a revert had you added a ], but you didn't. Going by the AfD the page will shortly be deleted anyway, and I haven't accused you of what you say. If you continue to make accusations against good faith you may well be reported to ], and further reverts will lead to a block. You have ignored lots of good advice, and continue to edit against wikipedia policies (] in particular). Have a look at ] and ]. ] <small>]</small> 13:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::The replaced text was referenced, and also included two links to existing Misplaced Pages articles. I do not feel you are editing in good faith. You have hung around deleting content and posting "edit war" notices and so far I see no evidence of your own efforts to write in an encyclopedic style on the article. Having patience and good faith and putting up with ridicule and vandalism are two different things. ] (]) | |||
Revision as of 13:41, 10 June 2009
Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Frei Hans! I am Call me Bubba and have been editing Misplaced Pages for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Misplaced Pages! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Call me Bubba (talk) 04:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Telepathy and war
In reverting my recent edit (placing the same text elsewhere is still a revert) and removing a tag you have gone well beyond the limits of WP:3RR. I suggest you stop, else you will be justifiably blocked (note I haven't reported you for this, as I'm extending good faith.) Verbal chat 11:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Replacing text in a different place can alter the tone of an article. As the content refers to other Misplaced Pages content and is relevant to the section, and as I am aiming for a neutral tone, I thought you might prefer it where I put it. If you continue to accuse me of making unreasonable edits, while expecting that you yourself can "justifiably" remove large blocks of cited and referenced text, then perhaps Misplaced Pages is not the place for you. Why not start an article yourself, have a go at citing and referencing it, and then ask me for feedback. Frei Hans (talk) 12:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- The rules governing WP:3RR are clear. The reintroduction of the text I removed, even in a different place, is a revert. It might not have been considered a revert had you added a WP:RS, but you didn't. Going by the AfD the page will shortly be deleted anyway, and I haven't accused you of what you say. If you continue to make accusations against good faith you may well be reported to WP:WQA, and further reverts will lead to a block. You have ignored lots of good advice, and continue to edit against wikipedia policies (WP:OR in particular). Have a look at WP:YFA and WP:TUTORIAL. Verbal chat 13:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- The replaced text was referenced, and also included two links to existing Misplaced Pages articles. I do not feel you are editing in good faith. You have hung around deleting content and posting "edit war" notices and so far I see no evidence of your own efforts to write in an encyclopedic style on the article. Having patience and good faith and putting up with ridicule and vandalism are two different things. Frei Hans (talk)
- The rules governing WP:3RR are clear. The reintroduction of the text I removed, even in a different place, is a revert. It might not have been considered a revert had you added a WP:RS, but you didn't. Going by the AfD the page will shortly be deleted anyway, and I haven't accused you of what you say. If you continue to make accusations against good faith you may well be reported to WP:WQA, and further reverts will lead to a block. You have ignored lots of good advice, and continue to edit against wikipedia policies (WP:OR in particular). Have a look at WP:YFA and WP:TUTORIAL. Verbal chat 13:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)