Revision as of 03:48, 11 June 2009 editDanski14 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users16,432 edits agree + biotag← Previous edit |
Revision as of 03:48, 11 June 2009 edit undoTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →Don't delete thisNext edit → |
Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
No one ever wanted to delete the original article until after the stuff about his illegal drug use was added. So the reason it was deleted was an attempt at censorship. The deletion had nothing to do with any lack of notability, because no one wanted to delete it until after the drug stuff was added. ] (]) 03:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
No one ever wanted to delete the original article until after the stuff about his illegal drug use was added. So the reason it was deleted was an attempt at censorship. The deletion had nothing to do with any lack of notability, because no one wanted to delete it until after the drug stuff was added. ] (]) 03:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
:I Agree. Is notable, and verifiability criterion is met, as is shown by references. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
:I Agree. Is notable, and verifiability criterion is met, as is shown by references. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:You should know by now that the way to go about this is to work on it in your own userspace, and then solicit outside opinion as to whether or not the article merits recreation. Simply recreating an extremely contentious BLP article is perhaps the worst way to go about this. ] (]) 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
No one ever wanted to delete the original article until after the stuff about his illegal drug use was added. So the reason it was deleted was an attempt at censorship. The deletion had nothing to do with any lack of notability, because no one wanted to delete it until after the drug stuff was added. Grundle2600 (talk) 03:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)