Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
How come no one ever wanted to delete ] and ]? ] (]) 04:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
How come no one ever wanted to delete ] and ]? ] (]) 04:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I have to say, the article does provide VALID INDEPENDENT sources such as CNN. I honestly do not understand why this is being contested ] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!--Template:UnsignedIP--><!--AutosignedbySineBot-->
I have to say, the article does provide VALID INDEPENDENT sources such as CNN. I honestly do not understand why this is being contested ] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)</span>] (]) 04:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Don't delete this
No one ever wanted to delete the original article until after the stuff about his illegal drug use was added. So the reason it was deleted was an attempt at censorship. The deletion had nothing to do with any lack of notability, because no one wanted to delete it until after the drug stuff was added. Grundle2600 (talk) 03:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You should know by now that the way to go about this is to work on it in your own userspace, and then solicit outside opinion as to whether or not the article merits recreation. Simply recreating an extremely contentious BLP article is perhaps the worst way to go about this. Tarc (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
The ONLY reason anyone ever wanted to delete it was because of the drug stuff, and that's censorship. No one ever said the subject wasn't notable until AFTER the drug stuff was added. The reason for deletion never had anything to do with notability, which is why the articles on both of Gore's daughters have never been deleted. It's because of the drug stuff - that's the ONLY difference between this article and those other two. Grundle2600 (talk) 04:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
