Revision as of 05:50, 17 June 2009 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: 202.76.169.2: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:02, 19 June 2009 edit undoEsseinrebusinanetamenfatearenecessest (talk | contribs)182 edits →Greek Love: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 318: | Line 318: | ||
Re : Well, I just made the same mistake you did. =) We both read the block log incorrectly. I blocked him for a year on June 17, 200'''8'''. Amazingly, the IP is active 20 hours after the block was lifted. I thought something was wrong with the block, didn't notice the year difference either, so I reapplied the block for another year. So... the IP is back to being blocked. -- ] (]) 05:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | Re : Well, I just made the same mistake you did. =) We both read the block log incorrectly. I blocked him for a year on June 17, 200'''8'''. Amazingly, the IP is active 20 hours after the block was lifted. I thought something was wrong with the block, didn't notice the year difference either, so I reapplied the block for another year. So... the IP is back to being blocked. -- ] (]) 05:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Greek Love == | |||
Hi Geronimo! There is a message for you here: ]. Thanks. ] (]) 05:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:02, 19 June 2009
Archives |
Same again please Geronimo?
For the gastropod genus Cylichna, is this from Powell? "The shells are ovate to cylindrical, with a sunken spire, a long aperture, and a simple columella, often with a weak single fold."
Best, Invertzoo (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Geronimo. From my limited perspective it seems to be the case (as I think I said at the beginning of this unpleasant discovery), that every article that GB started contains copyvio. In the case of the gastropods at any rate, it is the description section that is the usual offender. I think I will just go through and remove that section in all the gastropod articles I can find that he started, the ones that were not flagged before as they were not in Project Gastropod and also were not in Category molluscs of New Zealand. Unfortunately he also started a lot of gastropod family articles too, those I will have to check for through the genus articles. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Maybe you can try to look up this: Powelliphanta "Augustus"... GB claims to have used Powell on this but it seems the species was not discovered until after Powell's book came out so that doesn't make any sense. Thanks again, Invertzoo (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
And I am wondering if this sounds too much like Powell or not? It could be under Keyhole limpet in Powell or perhaps under a Powell section on Fissurellidae:
"Keyhole limpets somewhat resemble true limpets because of their simple conical shells, but in reality they are not closely related to true limpets, which are in the clade Patellogastropoda."
"For respiration, the shells of fissurellids have an apical perforation, marginal slit, notch, or internal groove. This allows a direct exit of exhalant water currents from the mantle cavity. In addition, keyhole limpets differ in several other ways both internally and externally from true limpets."
Thanks again, Invertzoo (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Here I am again. Would you check Powell under Cancellariidae please? Does it say:
"The shells are mainly clathrate sculptured and have a rather simple aperture, the anterior canal being represented by a weak sinus at the end of a columellar twist. The columella has three or four plaits that may be very strong or weak. Cancellarids are carnivorous."
And a question about the family Trimusculidae. Is some or all of this in Powell?
"The shells of these snails are somewhat limpet-like, but they are not at all closely related to the true limpets. They are air-breathing pulmonates, and can be distinguished from the true limpets by the presence of an internal lateral groove on the right side along with an interruption of the internal muscle scar ring. These shell features corresponds to the positioning of pulmonary orifice. These distinguishing shell characters are not as noticeable as they are in the shells of the Siphonariidae."
Thanks so much, Invertzoo (talk) 13:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
It's me once again. I am now on the gastropod family Bursidae. I think you said that Powell does not have family descriptions, so I suppose that the info might be under the genus Bursa (or under the species Bursa bubo lissostoma or Bursa verrucosa.)
"Species in this family occur in tropical oceans, including the Indo-Pacific, the Caribbean Sea and other marginal warm seas."
"The anterior and posterior canals are well developed. The varices are often in two continuous series, one down each side of the shell. A periostracum is usually absent."
"The radula is distinctive, the central tooth being saddle-shaped, with long basal limbs, each bearing a cusp-like spur upon its face."
Bursa: "The shells are moderate to very large, often very thick and solid. The operculum is thick and horny, and the nucleus varies from mediolateral to terminal."
Bursa bubo lissostoma "Distribution: This subspecies is endemic to the Indo-Pacific oceans. "Habitat: This frog shell is found from low water to depths up to 180 m. "Shell description: The shell is large with long, pointed peripheral tubercles, and a dilated outer lip. The apertural callus is pinkish, with a rim of bright orange-red just within the aperture."
Thanks so much Gerononimo.... Invertzoo (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Many thanks for looking all of these up, I really appreciate it. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 23:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Fishing
Sorry if I didn't say in the edit summary, but it seems like a violation of WP:EL If you disagree, let's discuss on fishing page talk. Thanks Bob98133 (talk) 16:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Ed Ricketts
Why is the image necessary? Just curious... Feel free to respond on the talk page. Viriditas (talk) 10:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Looking into this further, I can see why you added it back in. But, I think it would help if you expanded the article to include more information about their relationship. Viriditas (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have apologized to Nihil novi. I would like to apologize to you as well, and I hope we can work on Ed Ricketts together in the future. Viriditas (talk) 09:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the thoughtful message! :) Viriditas (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have apologized to Nihil novi. I would like to apologize to you as well, and I hope we can work on Ed Ricketts together in the future. Viriditas (talk) 09:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
The Powell book
Thanks for asking. Here is my situation: the Sunday after next (the 19th April) I will be going away on vacation/fieldwork for 3 weeks, and will not be online during that time. From today until the 19th, I will keep working on fixing up suspected copyvio mollusk articles, but most of the time now I can guess pretty well which ones have copyvio, and which parts are the copyvio sections.
Thus, if you want to take the Powell book back now and then maybe get it out again after May 9th when I return, that would be one reasonable possibility. I could simply tag on my list which articles (a minority) I would like to check with the book, and then hopefully do that after I return (once I am back in gear again which takes me a few days.) How does that sound?
Invertzoo (talk) 22:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
OK, thanks Geronimo, that sounds like a plan. Invertzoo (talk) 22:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Orlady adminship
I think your comments on Orlady's Talk page explaining why you would oppose her admin nomination would be appropriate to share in the RfA, FYI, now open. doncram (talk) 02:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Fishing tournament
Apparently, you didn't notice, but your link was never removed, but it was moved to the "External link" section where it's more appropriate. Jauerback/dude. 02:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- As I tried to explain above, the only reason I undid the change again without discussing it on the article's talk page was because I didn't think you realized that the link was, in fact, still in the article. Anyway, I've now opened up discussion on the article talk page rather than through edit summaries or on your talk page. On a sidenote, I accidentally hit the "rollback" button on your edit yesterday, so I rollbacked my own revert, since that's not the purpose of using that function. I apologize on any confusion that might have caused. Jauerback/dude. 13:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Do you plan giving your reasoning for using your link as a reference? If not, I plan on moving it back to the "External link" section. Jauerback/dude. 11:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Fishing tackle
On April 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fishing tackle, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Library books
Just a reminder that the library books are due back in two days time, on Tuesday. If you still need them, let me know and I'll try to renew them for another two weeks.-gadfium 01:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Epipelagic. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Huberia striata
What talk page are you talking about?--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Looks good. Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Loihi Seamount
Resident Mario (talk · contribs) is getting ready to nominate Loihi Seamount for FAC. I have concerns about some of the material in the article. Would it be possible to request your help in this matter? I was wondering if you could run Copyscape Premium on this article. If not, that's ok, maybe you can help out in some other way since you are knowledgeable in this area. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 00:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! :) Viriditas (talk) 05:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Deleting welcomes from other people
I have been reverted it. I think she should know more about Misplaced Pages, and if she want to try test she can use the sandbox. Sorry. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Peer approval
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | ||
For all the work you've done in helping with the massive copyright cleanup efforts at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Gastropods/Subpage for organizing CopyVio Cleanup. --Moonriddengirl 14:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC) |
- Not that we're finished. :) But your valiant efforts there have been noticed and appreciated. I have been highly impressed with the way Wikipedians have pulled together to address this problem and with your individual contributions. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl 14:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of American shad fishing
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article American shad fishing, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Apprently a collection of the best fishing spots - would appear to violate WP:NOTGUIDE
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Mahi-mahi fishing
Sorry about that. That edit summary on the page probably came across as rude. I wasn't trying to "harass" you, either. Anyway, I'll see what I can find to help add to the article - if I'm going to delete something, it would only be fair to add something in its place, as well. Radiant chains (talk) 07:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
References for intensive aquacultrure
Rather than dumping my endnotes files, I just added one on superintensive recycle water treatment and one for hetrotrophic recycle systems (where you grow decomposers on the fish manure along with algae and get the whole mass of material recycled back into the fish -- clever, but an energy burner with high oxygen demand with low capital cost. Also goes under the name of ODAS (organic detrital algal soup).
Almost all other system are in between these two extremes.
Dallas Weaver —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deweaver (talk • contribs) 21:33, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
American shad fishing
Hiya. Whilst I appreciate you're trying to clean up the article, my concern - and the reason I PRODded it, was that the article reads less like an article about the fish per se, and more like a list of the best places to go fishing for it....which to me violates WP:NOT. CultureDrone (talk) 06:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Fast response :-) As long as you're intending to clean it up, thats great - how about tagging it as underconstruction to avoid me (or other over-zealous editors) trying to delete it in the meantime ? CultureDrone (talk) 07:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Oceania topic
Hi Geronimo,
I'll certainly give it a go!
Happy editing,
Neelix (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Mahi-mahi fishing
On April 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mahi-mahi fishing, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for Fishing village
On April 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fishing village, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Re: Gallery
WP:IG: "if, due to its content, a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of ", as opposed to a more descriptive title, the gallery should either be revamped or moved to the Commons."
Rename the gallery to something more descriptive and useful, then. Gary King (talk) 22:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Taura
I wrote the original long article. It was a cut and paste from another article I wrote and the reference system does not make any sense for wiki (Lightner et al. 1999b????). I am trying to make my text more wiki friendly and refer to internet sources that are easily searcheable. I don't want to justify all my edits as this is a non controversial topic and I am simply cleaning up my original text. Some highly technical stuff isn't relevant to the wiki audience and has been removed. Please let me finish cleaning up my article. I will try to be done tonight. You can edit for grammar and English if you wish but I am very knowledgeable about this topic and I am doing a good job. Thank you. I am not familiar with all wiki functions so I am taking this window to communicate with you. Ferts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferts (talk • contribs) 21:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Aquatic animal health?=
There seem to be very few articles on aquatic animal health. I have the scientific base but lack the editing and writing capabilities. Is there any possibilities/interest for collaboration? I found no entries on the following topic: Bacterial kidney disease Infectious pancreatic necrosis pancreas disease of salmonids fish furonculosis Enteric redmouth ..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferts (talk • contribs) 01:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Powell
Thanks very much for the note Geronimo. I will attempt to do all the remaining odds and ends of mollusk copyvio clean-up over the next few weeks. Thanks again, Invertzoo (talk) 14:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Aquaculture of salmon
On May 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aquaculture of salmon, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
School and the dab project
- Please add a reference to Shoaling and schooling for the "synchronized" definition of school
- Please discuss any change to the dab page used as an example in the dab guidelines before making the change, as requested in the comments of the page. Ignoring that is disruptive.
Cheers! -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- No, this is just another case of an editor not reading or understanding the requests in pages. And, of course, I only reverted your edit once; other editors reverted it before. Instead of working within the guidelines (WP:BRD), you opt to skirt close to WP:CIVIL. The disruptive note was not lightly; your edits were disrupting another project, and I made you aware of it. Remember you're in a group here, and not everyone is going to agree with you. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- (Answering a question from the splintered conversation): Let's just summarize with WP:BRD. You made a change to School (disambiguation), it was reverted (threetimes now, when you should have stopped at one). If you feel the change should be made, discuss it on Talk:School (disambiguation). -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- No, this is just another case of an editor not reading or understanding the requests in pages. And, of course, I only reverted your edit once; other editors reverted it before. Instead of working within the guidelines (WP:BRD), you opt to skirt close to WP:CIVIL. The disruptive note was not lightly; your edits were disrupting another project, and I made you aware of it. Remember you're in a group here, and not everyone is going to agree with you. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Great article
The Original Barnstar | ||
I'm presenting you this barnstar for your great work in expanding Shoaling and schooling. It's always great to find a comprehensive, well written scientific article on wikipedia. Keep up the good work! Smartse (talk) 14:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
- Thank you --Geronimo20 (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Shoaling and schooling
On May 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shoaling and schooling, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
25 DYK award
The 25 DYK Medal | ||
I noticed you had 25 DYKs on the List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs, but you didn't have the award, so I gave it to you. mynameinc 15:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
Powell copyright questions
Hi Geronimo, I wanted to ask about the land snail genus Powelliphanta and one species. I got stuck on these because I can't guess how much of them was copied verbatim from Powell. Can you maybe help me a bit with these two?
- Powelliphanta "Augustus" -- ??? I need some help with this one, can't make out if GB put copyvio info into this or not. Invertzoo (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much! Invertzoo (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Puretic power block
On May 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Puretic power block, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies
Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Check in Powell?
HI Geronimo, if you still have Powell, could you look at the WP article Hydatina and see if the text under "Species" is copied from that source?
Thanks so much, Invertzoo (talk) 23:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on all this stuff. I really appreciate it. Invertzoo (talk) 01:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Please consider giving your opinion here
About italic titles for articles about taxa at the level of genus and below. Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: 202.76.169.2
Re your message: Well, I just made the same mistake you did. =) We both read the block log incorrectly. I blocked him for a year on June 17, 2008. Amazingly, the IP is active 20 hours after the block was lifted. I thought something was wrong with the block, didn't notice the year difference either, so I reapplied the block for another year. So... the IP is back to being blocked. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Greek Love
Hi Geronimo! There is a message for you here: Talk: Greek love#Committee for keeping Greek Love. Thanks. Esseinrebusinanetamenfatearenecessest (talk) 05:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)