| Revision as of 01:22, 18 June 2009 editTerrillja (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,945 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Whale Wars. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:49, 18 June 2009 edit undoPrBeacon (talk | contribs)3,108 edits →June 2009Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| == June 2009 == | == June 2009 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Whale Wars|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''You are over 3 reverts in one day on the article. Consider taking your concerns to the talkpage. Both warring editors are being warned.'' ]] 01:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Whale Wars|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''You are over 3 reverts in one day on the article. Consider taking your concerns to the talkpage. Both warring editors are being warned.'' ]] 01:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi Terrillja,<br />First of all I apologize to you & the other admins here for what must seem like just another revert war. But I'm not sure how we resolve the dispute over 'violent direct action.' As you can see, NRen2k5 is now trying to play down his belligerent role thus far. In a sense I regret responding to him, but I thought he was honestly discussing the issue until he got personal. As I said in the Wikiquette alert, "we're here because you brought it here first. You can try all you want to appear unbiased and victimized, but the record speaks for itself." I still think the term "violent" it is more than just misleading, it is irresponsible. ] (]) 03:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:49, 18 June 2009
Welcome!
Hello, PrBeacon, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- BlueDevil 01:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Whale Wars. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You are over 3 reverts in one day on the article. Consider taking your concerns to the talkpage. Both warring editors are being warned. Terrillja talk 01:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Terrillja,
First of all I apologize to you & the other admins here for what must seem like just another revert war. But I'm not sure how we resolve the dispute over 'violent direct action.' As you can see, NRen2k5 is now trying to play down his belligerent role thus far. In a sense I regret responding to him, but I thought he was honestly discussing the issue until he got personal. As I said in the Wikiquette alert, "we're here because you brought it here first. You can try all you want to appear unbiased and victimized, but the record speaks for itself." I still think the term "violent" it is more than just misleading, it is irresponsible. Fhue (talk) 03:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)