Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/proposal for Ireland Article: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:09, 19 June 2009 editDomer48 (talk | contribs)16,098 edits added section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:15, 19 June 2009 edit undoBritishWatcher (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,860 edits CommentsNext edit →
Line 31: Line 31:
What created the ambiguity was it the wrong naming of Ireland as ROI? <strong>]</strong>] 11:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC) What created the ambiguity was it the wrong naming of Ireland as ROI? <strong>]</strong>] 11:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
*I'm attempting to locate the discussion to determine that see comment above. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 11:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC) *I'm attempting to locate the discussion to determine that see comment above. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 11:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
: Dunc it was the government of southern Ireland declearing their country title to be that of the island that has made ] ambiguous. They are to blame and they probably added that the official description is "Republic of Ireland", knowing people would need something else to call them in certain cases to avoid confusion. ] (]) 15:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 15:15, 19 June 2009

Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Comments for

Comments against

Editors must not use sweeping claims or generalisations, and all claims must be supported by referenced sources. Please address one point at a time.

  • GoodDay, no one has suggested deleting the Republic of Ireland article. This proposal is not about the RoI Article it's about the Ireland article.
  • MickMacNee, you suggested an “Ireland which would cover all conceivable Ireland/Irish topics, such as History, Geography, Politics, Culture etc etc etc. This would include the content from the RoI Article, that's a merger, but this is not your proposal. This is a compilation of a number of proposals by a number of Editors.
  • BritishWatcher. Nothing to discuss.
  • Rockpocket. All that can be said is provide a Diff for the discussion were there was a consensus that "Ireland is ambiguous." No one can seem to find it. Provide sources to support this opinion per WP:V. Without Diff's there is nothing to discuss.

--Domer48'fenian' 19:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


Comments neither for, nor against

  1. Fmph have a look at the China Article. Notice how it covers subjects in general way in the article, but with each section linking to a more detailed article. That's the idea. Some sections would deal with the whole island for example such as History, Geography, Politics, Culture etc. --Domer48'fenian' 19:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Editors must not use sweeping claims or generalisations, and all claims must be supported by referenced sources. Please address one point at a time.

Domer, you said "All that can be said is provide a Diff for the discussion were there was a consensus that 'Ireland is ambiguous.'" Which Ireland/Ireland? Bastun 08:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

What created the ambiguity was it the wrong naming of Ireland as ROI? BigDunc 11:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Dunc it was the government of southern Ireland declearing their country title to be that of the island that has made Ireland ambiguous. They are to blame and they probably added that the official description is "Republic of Ireland", knowing people would need something else to call them in certain cases to avoid confusion. BritishWatcher (talk) 15:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

References