| Revision as of 21:55, 21 June 2009 editDream Focus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,002 edits →Legend of gatorface: Google before you nominate← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:54, 22 June 2009 edit undoVianello (talk | contribs)17,182 edits Keep (reversal of prior opinion)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Strong Keep''' and rename the now improved article, as it meets the inclusion reqirements of ]. ''']''' '']'' 21:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | *'''Strong Keep''' and rename the now improved article, as it meets the inclusion reqirements of ]. ''']''' '']'' 21:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' The New York Times and Rotten Tomatoes both thought it notable enough to have reviews for it. ]''' 21:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' The New York Times and Rotten Tomatoes both thought it notable enough to have reviews for it. ]''' 21:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep (reversal of previous stance)'''. This has been substantially improved since its initial submission and notability has been clearly asserted. I would like to restate my stance as being that this article should be kept. Hats off to the clean-up crew on this one. - ] (]) 03:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:54, 22 June 2009
Legend of gatorface
- Legend of gatorface (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No asserted notability in article or in some (admittedly cursory) searching. Seems to be a real movie (though the proper title is "The Legend of Gatorface"), but not one with any substantive background. - Vianello (Talk) 03:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- pablohablo. 13:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment as Vianello states, if kept, this should be moved to The Legend of Gator Face. pablohablo. 13:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Keep and rename the now improved article, as it meets the inclusion reqirements of WP:NF. Schmidt, 21:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The New York Times and Rotten Tomatoes both thought it notable enough to have reviews for it. Dream Focus 21:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep (reversal of previous stance). This has been substantially improved since its initial submission and notability has been clearly asserted. I would like to restate my stance as being that this article should be kept. Hats off to the clean-up crew on this one. - Vianello (Talk) 03:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)