| Revision as of 01:53, 2 July 2009 editYachtsman1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,634 edits →Report date July 1 2009, 23:45 (UTC)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:07, 2 July 2009 edit undoNathan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,146 edits nullNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| * {{checkuser|1=LaVidaLoca}} | * {{checkuser|1=LaVidaLoca}} | ||
| <!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> | <!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> | ||
Revision as of 02:07, 2 July 2009
Wildhartlivie
Wildhartlivie (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Wildhartlivie/Archive.
Report date July 1 2009, 23:45 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- LaVidaLoca (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by Viriditas
Wildhartlivie says that LaVidaLoca is his WP:ROOMMATE account and that they share the same IP but use different computers. While this may be true or not, they edit the same articles, revert for each other during edit wars and disputes, , defend each other in disputesand use the same or similar but unique language and phrasing in their edit summaries and talk pages. ("w/", "completely", "&", "yet another", "???" ) There are few, if any overlapping edits, and the LaVidaLoca account appears to only edit articles when Wildhartlivie is inactive. Viriditas (talk) 23:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
I have no knowledge of Wilhartlivie or his room mate, nor is this information directly relevant to IP searching, etc., but it is worth a short mention: undisclosed above is that Viriditas has engaged in a long and extensive Wikihounding campaign against Wildhartlive, myself and Yachtsman1, that is now the subject of an RfCU. I won't go into details, but it includes NUMEROUS false charges and conspiracy theories.Mosedschurte (talk) 01:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Where is the abuse? I see a few examples of editing the same article over the span of years, but no real pattern of long term abuse that warrants any sort of action from two editors who share the same address. I also noted overlap on June 4, 2009 at 1:27 p.m. between the two editors. Also, please take note of this: and compare with this pointed edit: The "defending" each other allegation involves a sock who was banned, and with whom the initator of this investigation also had differences. --Yachtsman1 (talk) 01:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions
Category: