| Revision as of 00:59, 4 December 2005 editHaukurth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators26,987 edits Comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:01, 4 December 2005 edit undoHollow Wilerding (talk | contribs)1,484 edits CommentNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| *'''Comment'''. ... -] 22:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''. ... -] 22:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :* |
:*Inactionable. Please be more specific. :) —] 22:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment'''. It's too soon to renominate this. It rolled off less than 4 days ago, and even then Raul had given it an extra go. ] | ] 23:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''. It's too soon to renominate this. It rolled off less than 4 days ago, and even then Raul had given it an extra go. ] | ] 23:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :*It's never too soon to do anything. I will continue to bring this article back into the nomination process until it is passed. —] 23:26, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | :*It's never too soon to do anything. I will continue to bring this article back into the nomination process until it is passed. —] 23:26, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *Will you? '''Object''', misuse of process. ] | ] 00:43, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | *Will you? '''Object''', misuse of process. ] | ] 00:43, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :*Your objection is unactonable, and therefore will be ignored. —] 01:01, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Your zeal is commendable, Hollow, and you've done a lot of good work on that article. Give the issue some time to rest and then people will take a fresh look. - ] 00:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | *Your zeal is commendable, Hollow, and you've done a lot of good work on that article. Give the issue some time to rest and then people will take a fresh look. - ] 00:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:01, 4 December 2005
Second attempt. Let's see what kind of controversy the article can stir this time. —Hollow Wilerding 21:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. ... -Silence 22:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Inactionable. Please be more specific. :) —Hollow Wilerding 22:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. It's too soon to renominate this. It rolled off less than 4 days ago, and even then Raul had given it an extra go. Bishonen | talk 23:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- It's never too soon to do anything. I will continue to bring this article back into the nomination process until it is passed. —Hollow Wilerding 23:26, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Will you? Object, misuse of process. Bishonen | talk 00:43, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Your objection is unactonable, and therefore will be ignored. —Hollow Wilerding 01:01, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Your zeal is commendable, Hollow, and you've done a lot of good work on that article. Give the issue some time to rest and then people will take a fresh look. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 00:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)