| Revision as of 19:28, 5 December 2005 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 edits →[]: this were not Belarusian national uprisings: do you see any difference between Poles and Belarusians at all?← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:43, 5 December 2005 edit undoMolobo (talk | contribs)13,968 editsm expanded historical information, added clarification, and please comment on the talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| The ] of ] constituted the ] as an influential player in ]an ] and the largest multinational empire in Europe. While Ukraine and ] became subject to the ], Belarus was still regarded as part of Lithuania. The new polity was dominated by much more densely populated Poland, which had 134 representatives in the ] as compared to 46 representatives of the Grand Duchy. However the Grand Duchy retained much autonomy, and was governed by a separate code of laws called the ], which codified both civil and property rights. ] was the largest urban centre of the territory of modern-day Belarus, followed by ], ], ], ], and ], whose population exceeded 10,000. In addition, ], the former capital of the Grand Duchy, also had a significant Ruthenian population.{{ref|belarus-1}} | The ] of ] constituted the ] as an influential player in ]an ] and the largest multinational empire in Europe. While Ukraine and ] became subject to the ], Belarus was still regarded as part of Lithuania. The new polity was dominated by much more densely populated Poland, which had 134 representatives in the ] as compared to 46 representatives of the Grand Duchy. However the Grand Duchy retained much autonomy, and was governed by a separate code of laws called the ], which codified both civil and property rights. ] was the largest urban centre of the territory of modern-day Belarus, followed by ], ], ], ], and ], whose population exceeded 10,000. In addition, ], the former capital of the Grand Duchy, also had a significant Ruthenian population.{{ref|belarus-1}} | ||
| With time the ethnic pattern did not evolve much. Throughout their existence as a separate culture, Ruthenians (Belarusians) formed in most cases rural population, with the power held by local ] and ]s, often of Lithuanian, Polish or Russian descent. As in the rest of Central and Eastern Europe, the ] and commerce was mostly monopolized by ] and ], who formed a significant part of the urban population. Since the ] of ] local nobility started to be adopted by the ] into the ] and formed a significant part of |
With time the ethnic pattern did not evolve much. Throughout their existence as a separate culture, Ruthenians (Belarusians) formed in most cases rural population, with the power held by local ] and ]s, often of Lithuanian, Polish or Russian descent. As in the rest of Central and Eastern Europe, the ] and commerce was mostly monopolized by ] and ], who formed a significant part of the urban population. Since the ] of ] local nobility started to be adopted by the ] and formed a significant part of it. Initially mostly Ruthenian and Orthodox, with time most of them became ]. This was especially true for major ] families (] and ] clans being the most notable), whose personal fortunes and properties often surpassed those of the royal families and were huge enough to be called a state within a state. Many of them founded their own cities and settled them with settlers from other parts of Europe. For instance, there were many Scots, Germans and Dutch people inhabitating major towns of the area. Also, a notable number of Italian artists was "imported" to the lands of modern Belarus by the magnates. Contrary to Poland, in the lands of the Grand Duchy the peasants had little personal freedom in the Middle Ages. However, with time the magnates and the gentry gradually limited the few liberties of the serfs at the same time increasing their taxation, often in labour for the local gentry. This made many Ruthenians flee to the scarcely populated lands of the so-called '']'' in modern ], where they formed a large part of the ]. Others sought reffuge in the lands of other magnates, in Muscovy or Poland. | ||
| Also, with time the religious conflicts started to arise. The gentry with time started to adopt ] while the common people by large remained faithful to ]. Initially the ] of ] codified the pre-existant ]. However, the rule of an ultra-Catholic King ] was marked by numerous attempts to spread the Catholicism, mostly through his support for ] and the ]. Possibly to avoid such conflicts, in ] the Orthodox hierarchs of ] signed the ], breaking their links with the ] and placing themselves under the ]. Although the union was generally supported by most local Orthodox bishops and the king himself, it was opposed by some prominent nobles and, more importantly, by the nascent ] movement. This led to a series of conflicts and rebellions against the local authorities. The first of such happened in ], when the Cossack insurgents under ] took the towns of ] and ] and executed Polish magistrates there. Other such clashes took place in ] (1606-10), ] (1623), and ] (1623, 1633){{ref|belarus-2}}. This left the population of the ] by large divided onto ] and ] parts. At the same time, after the ] in the Orthodox Church (]), |
Also, with time the religious conflicts started to arise. The gentry with time started to adopt ] while the common people by large remained faithful to ]. Initially the ] of ] codified the pre-existant ]. However, the rule of an ultra-Catholic King ] was marked by numerous attempts to spread the Catholicism, mostly through his support for ] and the ]. Possibly to avoid such conflicts, in ] the Orthodox hierarchs of ] signed the ], breaking their links with the ] and placing themselves under the ]. Although the union was generally supported by most local Orthodox bishops and the king himself, it was opposed by some prominent nobles and, more importantly, by the nascent ] movement. This led to a series of conflicts and rebellions against the local authorities. The first of such happened in ], when the Cossack insurgents under ] took the towns of ] and ] and executed Polish magistrates there. Other such clashes took place in ] (1606-10), ] (1623), and ] (1623, 1633){{ref|belarus-2}}. This left the population of the ] by large divided onto ] and ] parts. At the same time, after the ] in the Orthodox Church (]), many of the members of the "old faith" migrated west, seeking refuge in the ], which ] to freely practice their faith {{ref|promemoria}}. | ||
| ] and ]]] | ] and ]]] | ||
| Despite the abovementioned conflicts, the literary tradition of Belarus evolved. Until ] the ], the predecessor of modern ], was used in all of the Grand Duchy as a ''chancerry language'', that is the language used for all official documents. Afterwards it was replaced with ], commonly spoken by the upper classes of Belarusian society. Both Polish and Ruthenian cultures gained a major cultural centre with the foundation of the ]. At the same time the Belarusian lands entered a path of economic growth, with the formation of numerous towns that served as a centre of trade on the east-west routes. However, both economical and cultural growth came to an end in mid-17th century with a series of violent wars against ], ], ] and ], as well as internal conflicts, known altogether as ]. The misfortunes were started in ] by ], who started a ] in the ]. Although the Cossacks were defeated in ] in the ], their rebellion gave |
Despite the abovementioned conflicts, the literary tradition of Belarus evolved. Until ] the ], the predecessor of modern ], was used in all of the Grand Duchy as a ''chancerry language'', that is the language used for all official documents. Afterwards it was replaced with ], commonly spoken by the upper classes of Belarusian society. Both Polish and Ruthenian cultures gained a major cultural centre with the foundation of the ]. At the same time the Belarusian lands entered a path of economic growth, with the formation of numerous towns that served as a centre of trade on the east-west routes. However, both economical and cultural growth came to an end in mid-17th century with a series of violent wars against ], ], ] and ], as well as internal conflicts, known altogether as ]. The misfortunes were started in ] by ], who started a ] in the ]. Although the Cossacks were defeated in ] in the ], their rebellion gave pretext to the Russians to invade and occupy the eastern half of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in ]. The Swedes invaded and occupied the rest in the same year. The wars had shown internal problems of the state, with some people of the Grand Duchy supporting the Muscovy {{ref|GSE}} while others (most notably ]) supporting the Swedes. Although the Swedes were finally driven back in ] and the Russians were defeated in ], most of the country was ruined. It is estimated that the Commonwealth lost 1/3 of its population, with some regions of Belarus loosing as much as 50%. | ||
| This broke the power of the once-powerful Commonwealth and the country gradually became vulnerable to foreign influence. On several occasions, Russian armies operated in the Polish Empire, further damaging Belarusian economy during their hostilities against other powers in the ] and the ]{{ref|promemoria2}}. By mid-] their presence in the lands of modern Belarus became almost permanent and eventually by ] Poland was ]. |
This broke the power of the once-powerful Commonwealth and the country gradually became vulnerable to foreign influence. On several occasions, Russian armies operated in the Polish Empire, further damaging Belarusian economy during their hostilities against other powers in the ] and the ]. There were also cases when the Russian armies kidnapped scores of eastern inhabitants of the Commonwealth, among them hundeds of thousands of Belarusian peasants{{ref|promemoria2}}. By mid-] their presence in the lands of modern Belarus became almost permanent and eventually by ] Poland was ]. All of the lands of Belarus were annexed by the ], thus starting a new period in Belarusian history. | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| ] in 1912]] | ] in 1912]] | ||
| Under Russian administration, the territory of Belarus was divided into the ]s of ], ], ], and ]. Belarusians were active in ] movement against Napoleon's occupation and ] the remains of the ] when it crossed the ] in November ]. With Napoleon's defeat, Belarus again became a part of ]. |
Under Russian administration, the territory of Belarus was divided into the ]s of ], ], ], and ]. Belarusians were active in ] movement against Napoleon's occupation and ] the remains of the ] when it crossed the ] in November ]. With Napoleon's defeat, Belarus again became a part of ]. National uprisings in ] and ], in which Belarusians took active part{{ref|Zytko-1}} were bloodily subdued by the Russians. <!-- The opportunity for freedom appeared only after the ] and the ]. | ||
| Although under ] and ] the national cultures were repressed due to the policy of de-] {{ref|vossoedinene}} or ] {{ref|Zytko-2}} which included the return to Orthodoxy, the ] was signified by the rise of the modern Belarusian nation and self-confidence. |
Although under ] and ] the national cultures were repressed due to the policy of de-] {{ref|vossoedinene}} or ] {{ref|Zytko-2}} which included the return to Orthodoxy, the ] was signified by the rise of the modern Belarusian nation and self-confidence. Industry was introduced to Belarusian economy, especially after ] in ]. However due to widespread poverty, and poor economy of the region peasants sought a better lot outside the region, with some 1,500,000 people leaving Belarus in half a century preceding the ]. | ||
| == 20th century == | == 20th century == | ||
Revision as of 19:43, 5 December 2005
This article describes the history of Belarus. The Belarusian ethnos is traced at least as far in time as other East Slavs. After initial period of independent feudal consolidation, Belarussian lands were included in Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Russian Empire, and finally regained their own state only in the beginning of the 20th centry.
Early history
The history of Belarus, or, more correctly of the Belarusian ethnicity, begins with the migration and expansion of the Slavic peoples throughout Eastern Europe between the 6th and 8th centuries Anno Domini. East Slavs settled on the territory within present-day Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, assimilating local Baltic (Belarus), Ugro-Finnic (Russia) and steppe nomads (Ukraine) already living there, early ethnic integrations that contributed to the gradual differentiation of the three East Slavic nations. These East Slavs were pagan, animistic, agrarian people whose economy included trade in agricultural produce, game, furs, honey, beeswax and amber.
The modern Belarusian ethnos was probably formed on the basis of the three Slavic tribes - Kryvians, Drehovians, Radzimians as well as several Baltic tribes.
During the 9th and 10th century, Scandinavian Vikings established trade posts on the way from Scandinavia to the Byzantine Empire. The network of lakes and rivers crossing East Slav territory provided a lucrative trade route between the two civilizations. In the course of trade, they gradually took sovereignty over the tribes of East Slavs, at least to the point required by improvements in trade.
The Rus' rulers invaded the Byzantine Empire on few occasions, but eventually they allied against the Bulgars. The condition underlying this alliance was to open the country for Christianization and acculturation from the Byzantine Empire.
The common cultural bond of Eastern Orthodox Christianity and written Church Slavonic (a literary and liturgical Slavic language developed by 8th century missionaries Saints Cyril and Methodius) fostered the emergence of a new geopolitical entity, Kievan Rus' -- a loose-knit network of principalities, established along preexisting trade routes, with major centers in Novgorod (currently Russia), Polatsk and Kiev (currently in Ukraine) — which claimed a sometimes precarious preeminence among them.
First Belarusian states
Between the 9th and 12th century, the principality of Polatsk (northern Belarus) emerged as the dominant center of power on Belarusian territory, with a lesser role played by the principality of Turaŭ in the south.
It repeatedly asserted its sovereignty in relation to other centers of Rus', becoming a political capital, the episcopal see of a bishopric and the controller of vassal territories among Balts in the west. The city's Cathedral of the Holy Wisdom (1044-1066), though completely rebuilt over the years, remains a symbol of this independent-mindedness, rivaling churches of the same name in Novgorod and Kiev, referring to the original Hagia Sophia in Constantinople (and hence to claims of imperial prestige, authority and sovereignty). Cultural achievements of the Polatsk period include the work of the nun Euphrosyne of Polatsk (1120-1173), who built monasteries, transcribed books, promoted literacy and sponsored art (including local artisan Lazarus Bohsha's famous "Cross of Euphrosyne," a national symbol and treasure stolen during World War II), and the prolific, original Church Slavonic sermons and writings of Bishop Cyril of Turau (1130-1182).
The Grand Duchy of Lithuania
In the 13th century, the fragile unity of Kievan Rus' disintegrated due to nomadic incursions from Asia, which climaxed with the Mongol Blue Horde's sacking of Kiev (1240), leaving a geopolitical vacuum in the region. The East Slavs splintered into a number of independent and competing principalities. Due to military conquest and dynastic marriages the Belarusian principalities were acquired by the expanding Lithuanians, beginning with the rule of King Mindouh (1240-1263). From the 13th to 15th century, Baltic, Belarusian and Ukrainian lands were consolidated into the multi-ethnic Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia, with its capital initially in Horodno, later in Navahradak (now in western Belarus) and finally in Vilnia.
The Lithuanians' smaller numbers and lack of written language or Christian culture in this medieval state gave the Belarusians and Ukrainians a major and important role in shaping Lithuanian political, religious and cultural life, and further assimilation between the Slavs and Balts occurred. Owing to the predominance of East Slavs and Eastern Orthodox faith among the state's population, Ruthenian became the official language of the country, used for its official chancery, legal, diplomatic and judicial needs until 1696, when it was eventually replaced by Polish.
This period of political breakdown and reorganization also saw the rise of written local vernaculars in place of the literary and liturgical Church Slavonic language, a further stage in the evolving differentiation between the Belarusian, Russian and Ukrainian languages.
Several Lithuanian monarchs - the last being Svitrigailo in 1432-1436 - championed interests of the Eastern Orthodox Ruthenian majority, while most monarchs and magnates increasingly came to reflect opinions of the Roman Catholic Lithuanian minority.
Construction of Orthodox churches in some parts of Belarus had been initially prohibited, as was the case of Vitebsk in 1480. On the other hand, further unification of the, mostly Orthodox, Grand Duchy with mostly Catholic Poland led to liberalization and partial solving of the religious problem. In 1511 King and Grand Duke Sigismund I the Old granted the Orthodox clergy with autonomy enjoyed previously only by Catholic clergy. In 1531 the privilege was enhanced in 1531, when the Orthodox church was no longer responsible to the Catholic bishop and instead the Metropolite was responsible only to the sobor of 8 Orthodox bishops, the Grand Duke and the Patriarch of Constantinople. The privilege also extended the jurisdiction of the Orthodox hierarchy over all Orthodox people.
In such circumstances, vibrant Belarusian culture flourished, mostly in major Belarusian cities . Despite the legal usage of Old Ruthenian language (predecessor of both modern Belarusian and Ukrainian languages) which was used as a chancerry language in all territory of the Grand Duchy, the literature was mostly non-existent, outside of several chronicles and letopises. hence the first Belarusian book was published in Prague. It was not until 1517 that the first printing press using Cyrillic alphabet was founded in Kraków. Soon afterwards Francysk Skaryna, a leading representative of the renaissance Belarusian culture, founded a similar printing press in Polatsk and started an extensive work of publishing the Bible and other religious works there. Apart from the Bible itself, until his death in 1551 he published 22 other books thus laying foundations for the evolution of the Ruthenian language into modern Belarusian language.
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
The Lublin Union of 1569 constituted the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as an influential player in European politics and the largest multinational empire in Europe. While Ukraine and Podlasia became subject to the Polish Crown, Belarus was still regarded as part of Lithuania. The new polity was dominated by much more densely populated Poland, which had 134 representatives in the Sejm as compared to 46 representatives of the Grand Duchy. However the Grand Duchy retained much autonomy, and was governed by a separate code of laws called the Lithuanian Statutes, which codified both civil and property rights. Mogilyov was the largest urban centre of the territory of modern-day Belarus, followed by Vitebsk, Polotsk, Pinsk, Slutsk, and Berestye, whose population exceeded 10,000. In addition, Vilna, the former capital of the Grand Duchy, also had a significant Ruthenian population.
With time the ethnic pattern did not evolve much. Throughout their existence as a separate culture, Ruthenians (Belarusians) formed in most cases rural population, with the power held by local szlachta and boyars, often of Lithuanian, Polish or Russian descent. As in the rest of Central and Eastern Europe, the trade and commerce was mostly monopolized by Armenians and Jews, who formed a significant part of the urban population. Since the Union of Horodlo of 1413 local nobility started to be adopted by the Polish gentry and formed a significant part of it. Initially mostly Ruthenian and Orthodox, with time most of them became polonized. This was especially true for major magnate families (Sapieha and Radziwiłł clans being the most notable), whose personal fortunes and properties often surpassed those of the royal families and were huge enough to be called a state within a state. Many of them founded their own cities and settled them with settlers from other parts of Europe. For instance, there were many Scots, Germans and Dutch people inhabitating major towns of the area. Also, a notable number of Italian artists was "imported" to the lands of modern Belarus by the magnates. Contrary to Poland, in the lands of the Grand Duchy the peasants had little personal freedom in the Middle Ages. However, with time the magnates and the gentry gradually limited the few liberties of the serfs at the same time increasing their taxation, often in labour for the local gentry. This made many Ruthenians flee to the scarcely populated lands of the so-called Wild Fields in modern Ukraine, where they formed a large part of the Cossacks. Others sought reffuge in the lands of other magnates, in Muscovy or Poland.
Also, with time the religious conflicts started to arise. The gentry with time started to adopt Catholicism while the common people by large remained faithful to Eastern Orthodoxy. Initially the Warsaw Compact of 1573 codified the pre-existant freedom of worship. However, the rule of an ultra-Catholic King Sigismund III Vasa was marked by numerous attempts to spread the Catholicism, mostly through his support for counterreformation and the Jesuits. Possibly to avoid such conflicts, in 1595 the Orthodox hierarchs of Kiev signed the Union of Brest, breaking their links with the Patriarch of Constantinople and placing themselves under the Patriarch of Rome. Although the union was generally supported by most local Orthodox bishops and the king himself, it was opposed by some prominent nobles and, more importantly, by the nascent Cossack movement. This led to a series of conflicts and rebellions against the local authorities. The first of such happened in 1595, when the Cossack insurgents under Severyn Nalivaiko took the towns of Slutsk and Mogilyov and executed Polish magistrates there. Other such clashes took place in Mogilyov (1606-10), Vitebsk (1623), and Polotsk (1623, 1633). This left the population of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania by large divided onto Greek Catholic and Greek Orthodox parts. At the same time, after the schizm in the Orthodox Church (Raskol), many of the members of the "old faith" migrated west, seeking refuge in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which allowed them to freely practice their faith .
_during_The_Deluge_and_Chmielnicki%27s_Uprising.png)
Despite the abovementioned conflicts, the literary tradition of Belarus evolved. Until 17th century the Ruthenian language, the predecessor of modern Belarusian, was used in all of the Grand Duchy as a chancerry language, that is the language used for all official documents. Afterwards it was replaced with Polish language, commonly spoken by the upper classes of Belarusian society. Both Polish and Ruthenian cultures gained a major cultural centre with the foundation of the Academy of Vilna. At the same time the Belarusian lands entered a path of economic growth, with the formation of numerous towns that served as a centre of trade on the east-west routes. However, both economical and cultural growth came to an end in mid-17th century with a series of violent wars against Muscovy, Sweden, Brandenburg and Transylvania, as well as internal conflicts, known altogether as The Deluge. The misfortunes were started in 1648 by Bohdan Chmielnicki, who started a large-scale Cossack uprising in the Ukraine. Although the Cossacks were defeated in 1651 in the battle of Beresteczko, their rebellion gave pretext to the Russians to invade and occupy the eastern half of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1655. The Swedes invaded and occupied the rest in the same year. The wars had shown internal problems of the state, with some people of the Grand Duchy supporting the Muscovy while others (most notably Janusz Radziwiłł) supporting the Swedes. Although the Swedes were finally driven back in 1657 and the Russians were defeated in 1662, most of the country was ruined. It is estimated that the Commonwealth lost 1/3 of its population, with some regions of Belarus loosing as much as 50%.
This broke the power of the once-powerful Commonwealth and the country gradually became vulnerable to foreign influence. On several occasions, Russian armies operated in the Polish Empire, further damaging Belarusian economy during their hostilities against other powers in the Great Northern War and the War of Polish succession. There were also cases when the Russian armies kidnapped scores of eastern inhabitants of the Commonwealth, among them hundeds of thousands of Belarusian peasants. By mid-18th century their presence in the lands of modern Belarus became almost permanent and eventually by 1795 Poland was partitioned by its neighbors. All of the lands of Belarus were annexed by the Russian Empire, thus starting a new period in Belarusian history.
Russian Empire
.jpg)
Under Russian administration, the territory of Belarus was divided into the guberniyas of Minsk, Vitebsk, Mogilyov, and Hrodno. Belarusians were active in guerilla movement against Napoleon's occupation and did their best to annihilate the remains of the Grande Armée when it crossed the Berezina River in November 1812. With Napoleon's defeat, Belarus again became a part of Imperial Russia. National uprisings in 1830 and 1863, in which Belarusians took active part were bloodily subdued by the Russians.
- Nina Strużyńska, "Anti-Soviet conspiracy and partisan struggle of the Green Oak Party in Belarus", in "Non Provinicial Europe", London 1999, ISBN 8386759925
- Sokrat Janowicz, "Forming of the Belorussian nation", RYTM, 1999
- Małgorzata Ruchniewicz, "Stosunki narodowościowe w latach 1939-1948 na obszarze tzw. Zachodniej Białorusi" in "Przemiany narodowościowe na kresach wschodnich II Rzeczypospolitej 1931-1948" ("Nationality relations in 1939-1948 on the territory of so-called Western Belarus", in Polish), Toruń, 2004, ISBN 8373228616
- Piotr Eberhardt, "Problematyka narodowościowa Białorusi w XX wieku" ("Nationality issue of Belarus in 20th century", in Polish), Lublin, 1996, ISBN 8385854169
- Jerzy Ogonowski, "Uprawnienia językowe mniejszości narodowych w Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej 1918-1939" ("The Language Rights of National Minorities in The Second Republic of Poland, 1918-1939", in Polish, English summary), Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warsaw, 2000
- Anatol Żytko, "Russian policy towards the Belorussian gentry in 1861-1914", Minsk
See also
- List of Belarusian rulers
- Soviet Union
- Collapse of the Soviet Union
- Commonwealth of Independent States
- History of Europe
- History of present-day nations and states
- Dzierzynszczyzna
- Kryvian
External links
- Belarus National Republic - the Belarusian Government in exile
- Stary Hetman - Belarusian history forums
- Belarus, by CIA World Factbook, 2000
- Belarus, by United States Department of State
- Belarusian diaspora
- Rulers.org — Belarus List of rulers for Belarus