User talk:Wladthemlat: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:46, 16 July 2009 editJpgordon (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,338 edits →July 2009 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:25, 21 July 2009 edit undoBaxter9 (talk \| contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,146 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 25:		Line 25:
	<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) -->		<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) -->
	\|}		\|}

			==Your last edit==
			{{uw-d2}}--'''<font color="#151B8D" face="comic sans ms">]</font>'''<sup><font color="red">]</font></sup> 13:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:25, 21 July 2009

hello

July 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Banská Bystrica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. lifebaka++ 22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. The duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question.

In addition, please do not use "vandalism" to refer to edits with which you disagree on content grounds William M. Connolley (talk) 08:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock|I fully undertand why I got blocked and I admit that I have lost my temper at that specific article. However, the reverts were mainly motivated by edits that contradict cited sources. I have discussed the topic on the talk page and will soon seek a dispute resolution as the frequent edits damage the article imo. I honestly did not know that 3 reverts result in a block, will be more careful next time.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Sounds like exactly what we want. --jpgordon 23:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Request handled by: jpgordon 23:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Your last edit

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.--B@xter 13:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)