Revision as of 20:33, 17 July 2009 editPieter Kuiper (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,010 edits removing sentence about a library fire - that is no excuse for believing all this← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:30, 18 July 2009 edit undoSergeWoodzing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,277 editsm restored factual text as factual as it gets here - see discussionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Sune Sik Sverkersson''', (born c. 1154), in older historical accounts, was a Swedish prince. According to ], he would have been a younger son of King ] and father of ]. | '''Sune Sik Sverkersson''', (born c. 1154), in older historical accounts, was a Swedish prince. According to ], he would have been a younger son of King ] and father of ]. | ||
In surviving medieval documents, the only ''Sune Sik'' that can be found{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} looks like he lived much later, which has caused some historians to view Olaus Petri's account of him as unreliable. That Sune Sik made a donation to ] as late as in 1297. He might have ordered a restauration of a chapel in which he eventually was interred, and later Cistercian tradition may then have turned him into a prince.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://fornvannen.se/pdf/1920talet/1921_022.pdf|author=Natanael Beckman|title=Kungagravar och medeltidshistoria.|journal=Fornvännen|year=1921|issue=16|pages=46|accessdate=2009-07-17|quote=Jag har nämnt ovan, att cisterciensernas tradition tilldelat Sverker en son, Sune Sik, som icke rimligtvis kan vara historisk i denna egenskap. Jag har också antytt, att han antagligen fått sin prinsvärdighet genom missförstånd och vore att identifiera med en donator till klostret, som möter i ett diplom av 1297}}</ref> | In surviving medieval documents, the only ''Sune Sik'' that can be found{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} looks like he lived much later, which has caused some early 19th century historians to view Olaus Petri's account of him as unreliable. That Sune Sik made a donation to ], which was recorded{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} as late as in 1297. He might have ordered a restauration of a chapel in which he eventually was interred, and later Cistercian tradition may then have turned him into a prince.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://fornvannen.se/pdf/1920talet/1921_022.pdf|author=Natanael Beckman|title=Kungagravar och medeltidshistoria.|journal=Fornvännen|year=1921|issue=16|pages=46|accessdate=2009-07-17|quote=Jag har nämnt ovan, att cisterciensernas tradition tilldelat Sverker en son, Sune Sik, som icke rimligtvis kan vara historisk i denna egenskap. Jag har också antytt, att han antagligen fått sin prinsvärdighet genom missförstånd och vore att identifiera med en donator till klostret, som möter i ett diplom av 1297}}</ref> | ||
Sune Sik, as a son of King Sverker, is still counted by some reliable Swedish historians as a possible person of history.<ref>Lars O. Lagerqvist and Nils Åberg (2002) in ''Kings and Rulers of Sweden'' ISBN 91-87064-35-9 p. 15</ref> | Sune Sik, as a son of King Sverker, is still counted by some reliable Swedish historians as a possible person of history.<ref>Lars O. Lagerqvist and Nils Åberg (2002) in ''Kings and Rulers of Sweden'' ISBN 91-87064-35-9 p. 15</ref> |
Revision as of 04:30, 18 July 2009
Sune Sik Sverkersson, (born c. 1154), in older historical accounts, was a Swedish prince. According to Olaus Petri, he would have been a younger son of King Sverker I of Sweden and father of Ingrid Ylva.
In surviving medieval documents, the only Sune Sik that can be found looks like he lived much later, which has caused some early 19th century historians to view Olaus Petri's account of him as unreliable. That Sune Sik made a donation to Vreta Abbey, which was recorded as late as in 1297. He might have ordered a restauration of a chapel in which he eventually was interred, and later Cistercian tradition may then have turned him into a prince.
Sune Sik, as a son of King Sverker, is still counted by some reliable Swedish historians as a possible person of history.
References
- Natanael Beckman (1921). "Kungagravar och medeltidshistoria" (PDF). Fornvännen (16): 46. Retrieved 2009-07-17.
Jag har nämnt ovan, att cisterciensernas tradition tilldelat Sverker en son, Sune Sik, som icke rimligtvis kan vara historisk i denna egenskap. Jag har också antytt, att han antagligen fått sin prinsvärdighet genom missförstånd och vore att identifiera med en donator till klostret, som möter i ett diplom av 1297
- Lars O. Lagerqvist and Nils Åberg (2002) in Kings and Rulers of Sweden ISBN 91-87064-35-9 p. 15
This Swedish biographical article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |