| Revision as of 01:00, 19 July 2009 editAliveatoms (talk | contribs)122 edits →Chloe Richards← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:20, 19 July 2009 edit undoC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,786 edits flag possible WP:POINTNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –''']''' | ] 00:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chloe Richards|]|}} | :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –''']''' | ] 00:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chloe Richards|]|}} | ||
| *'''KEEP (or merge)''' - This is a relevant article providing valuable added information to Misplaced Pages. Please stop the overzealous policing and deletion of Misplaced Pages articles. Furthermore, this meets each of Misplaced Pages's which explicitly states they are the only five rules, rendering all other arguments irrelevant.] (]) 01:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC) | *'''KEEP (or merge)''' - This is a relevant article providing valuable added information to Misplaced Pages. Please stop the overzealous policing and deletion of Misplaced Pages articles. Furthermore, this meets each of Misplaced Pages's which explicitly states they are the only five rules, rendering all other arguments irrelevant.] (]) 01:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :*<small>{{userlinks|Aliveatoms}} has made the identical argument on multiple AfD discussions within a short timespan. —''']''' (]) 01:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 01:20, 19 July 2009
Chloe Richards
- Chloe Richards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with all the usual fancruft issues. delete. Jack Merridew 08:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep character spanned 10 years, there must be a fair bit of coverage out there in the Australian/UK press on this character.GunGagdin 11:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Minor character; no real-world significance. –Moondyne 03:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Ten years on a notable show is an obvious indication of notability. Edward321 (talk) 13:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect Long spanning does not relate to notability - she was a minor character in the context of the series. Orderinchaos 13:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | 00:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- KEEP (or merge) - This is a relevant article providing valuable added information to Misplaced Pages. Please stop the overzealous policing and deletion of Misplaced Pages articles. Furthermore, this meets each of Misplaced Pages's Five Pillars which explicitly states they are the only five rules, rendering all other arguments irrelevant.Aliveatoms (talk) 01:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Aliveatoms (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has made the identical argument on multiple AfD discussions within a short timespan. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)