Template:FAR-instructions: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:26, 22 July 2009 editEubulides (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers27,779 edits Update to reflect new template.← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:49, 30 July 2009 edit undoYellowAssessmentMonkey (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,460 edits per talk, I thinkNext edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	'''Featured article review''' (FAR)		'''Featured article review''' (FAR)
	*In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". ~~The~~ ~~aim~~ is to ~~improve~~ ~~articles~~ ~~rather~~ ~~than~~ to ~~demote~~ ~~them~~. Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies. The ideal review would address the issues raised and close with no change in status.		*In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". Ideally, an article will be restored to meet contemporary standards, but in practice, many FAs may need to be changed significantly or completely rewritten to meet the criteria. As such, the vast majority of FARs result in the article being delisted, mainly due to a lack of interest in improving the article. Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies, but are not obligated to re-write the article. The ideal review would address the issues raised and close with no change in status.
	*Reviews can improve articles in various ways: Articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed.		*Reviews can improve articles in various ways: Articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed.
	*The featured article director, ], or his delegates ], ] and ], determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and, thus, that the nomination should be moved to the second stage.		*The featured article director, ], or his delegates ], ] and ], determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and, thus, that the nomination should be moved to the second stage.
Line 39:		Line 39:
	<span style="font-size:15pt"><b>Nominating an article for FAR</span></b>		<span style="font-size:15pt"><b>Nominating an article for FAR</span></b>

	Nominators ~~typically assist in the process of improvement; they may post only one nomination at a time,~~ should not nominate articles that are ] (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.		Nominators should not nominate articles that are ] (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.
	# Place <nowiki>{{subst:FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page".		# Place <nowiki>{{subst:FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page".
	# From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text.		# From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text.

Revision as of 00:49, 30 July 2009

Reviewing featured articles Shortcuts

This page is for the review and improvement of featured articles that may no longer meet the featured article criteria. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted.

There are two stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute.

Featured article review (FAR)

In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". Ideally, an article will be restored to meet contemporary standards, but in practice, many FAs may need to be changed significantly or completely rewritten to meet the criteria. As such, the vast majority of FARs result in the article being delisted, mainly due to a lack of interest in improving the article. Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies, but are not obligated to re-write the article. The ideal review would address the issues raised and close with no change in status.
Reviews can improve articles in various ways: Articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed.
The featured article director, Raul654, or his delegates Marskell, Joelr31 and YellowMonkey, determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and, thus, that the nomination should be moved to the second stage.

Featured article removal candidate (FARC)

An article is never listed as a removal candidate without first undergoing a review. In this second stage, participants may declare "keep" or "delist", supported by substantive comments, and further time is provided to overcome deficiencies.
Reviewers who declare "delist" should be prepared to return towards the end of the process to strike out their objections if they have been addressed.
The featured article director or his delegates determine whether there is consensus for a change in the status of a nomination, and close the listing accordingly.

Each stage typically lasts two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list.

Older reviews are stored in the archive. A bot will update the article talk page after the review is closed and moved to archives; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the {{FAR}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates {{articlehistory}}.

Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of Contents

Featured content:

Featured article candidates (FAC):

Featured article review (FAR):

Today's featured article (TFA):

Featured article tools:

Toolbox

Nominating an article for FAR

Nominators should not nominate articles that are featured on the main page (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.

Place {{subst:FAR}} at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page".
From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text.
Below the preloaded title, write which users and projects you'll notify (see #5 below), and your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the FA criterion/criteria that are at issue, then click on "Save page".
Click here, and place your nomination at the top of the list of nominated articles, {{Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/name of nominated article/archiveN}}, filling in the exact name of the nominated article and the archive number N. Click on "Save page".
Notify relevant parties by adding {{subst:FARMessage|ArticleName|alt=FAR subpage}} (for example, {{subst:FARMessage|Superman|alt=Superman/archive1}}) to relevant talk pages (insert article name). Relevant parties include main contributors to the article (identifiable through article stats script), the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status (identifiable through the Featured Article Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified). The message at the top of the FAR should indicate who you have notified.