| Revision as of 19:57, 29 July 2009 editRadiopathy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,608 edits Undid revision 304930220 by Jezhotwells (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:59, 30 July 2009 edit undoNarom (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,303 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Talk:Hollie Steel. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == July 2009 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Talk:Hollie Steel|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''I did warn you, but you had to go ahead and ignore me anyway.'' ] (]) 14:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:59, 30 July 2009
July 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Hollie Steel. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I did warn you, but you had to go ahead and ignore me anyway. Uksam88 (talk) 14:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)