Misplaced Pages

Template:FAR-instructions: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:56, 2 August 2009 editEubulides (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers27,779 edits Reword recently-added text for brevity and to make it a better summary of talkpage consensus. See WT:FAR#Problems with reinstated changes.← Previous edit Revision as of 13:33, 12 August 2009 edit undoTpbradbury (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,274 edits odd to have negativity in instructionsNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
<span style="font-size:16pt">Reviewing featured articles</span> {{shortcut|WP:FAR|WP:FARC}} <span style="font-size:16pt">Reviewing featured articles</span> {{shortcut|WP:FAR|WP:FARC}}


This page is for the review and improvement of ] that may no longer meet the ]. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted. Although successful reviews address the issues raised and close with no change in status, many FAs need so much improvement that they are delisted, mainly due to lack of interest. This page is for the review and improvement of ] that may no longer meet the ]. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted. Successful reviews address the issues raised and close with no change in article status; other FAs need so much improvement they are delisted.


There are two stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute. There are two stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute.
Line 10: Line 10:
'''Featured article review''' (FAR) '''Featured article review''' (FAR)
*In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies, but are not obligated to re-write the article. *In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies, but are not obligated to re-write the article.
*Reviews can improve articles in various ways: Articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed. *Reviews can improve articles in various ways: articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed.
*The featured article director, ], or his delegates ], ] and ], determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and, thus, that the nomination should be moved to the second stage. *The featured article director, ], or his delegates ], ] and ], determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and therefore the nomination should be moved to the second stage.


'''Featured article removal candidate''' (FARC) '''Featured article removal candidate''' (FARC)
Line 18: Line 18:
*The featured article director or his delegates determine whether there is consensus for a change in the status of a nomination, and close the listing accordingly. *The featured article director or his delegates determine whether there is consensus for a change in the status of a nomination, and close the listing accordingly.


Each stage typically lasts two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list. Each stage typically lasts two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it is useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list.


Older reviews are stored in the ]. A ] after the review is closed and moved to archives; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the <tt><nowiki>{{FAR}}</nowiki></tt> template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates <tt><nowiki>{{articlehistory}}</nowiki></tt>. Older reviews are stored in the ]. A ] after the review is closed and moved to archives; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the <tt><nowiki>{{FAR}}</nowiki></tt> template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates <tt><nowiki>{{articlehistory}}</nowiki></tt>.
Line 39: Line 39:
<span style="font-size:15pt"><b>Nominating an article for FAR</span></b> <span style="font-size:15pt"><b>Nominating an article for FAR</span></b>


Nominators should not nominate articles that are ] (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content. Nominators should not nominate articles that are ] - or have been featured there in the previous three days - and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.
# Place <nowiki>{{subst:FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page". # Place <nowiki>{{subst:FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page".
# From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. # From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text.

Revision as of 13:33, 12 August 2009

Reviewing featured articles Shortcuts

This page is for the review and improvement of featured articles that may no longer meet the featured article criteria. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted. Successful reviews address the issues raised and close with no change in article status; other FAs need so much improvement they are delisted.

There are two stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute.

Featured article review (FAR)

  • In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies, but are not obligated to re-write the article.
  • Reviews can improve articles in various ways: articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed.
  • The featured article director, Raul654, or his delegates Marskell, Joelr31 and YellowMonkey, determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and therefore the nomination should be moved to the second stage.

Featured article removal candidate (FARC)

  • An article is never listed as a removal candidate without first undergoing a review. In this second stage, participants may declare "keep" or "delist", supported by substantive comments, and further time is provided to overcome deficiencies.
  • Reviewers who declare "delist" should be prepared to return towards the end of the process to strike out their objections if they have been addressed.
  • The featured article director or his delegates determine whether there is consensus for a change in the status of a nomination, and close the listing accordingly.

Each stage typically lasts two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it is useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list.

Older reviews are stored in the archive. A bot will update the article talk page after the review is closed and moved to archives; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the {{FAR}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates {{articlehistory}}.

Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of Contents

Featured content:

Featured article candidates (FAC):

Featured article review (FAR):

Today's featured article (TFA):

Featured article tools:

Toolbox

Nominating an article for FAR

Nominators should not nominate articles that are featured on the main page - or have been featured there in the previous three days - and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.

  1. Place {{subst:FAR}} at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page".
  2. From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text.
  3. Below the preloaded title, write which users and projects you'll notify (see #5 below), and your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the FA criterion/criteria that are at issue, then click on "Save page".
  4. Click here, and place your nomination at the top of the list of nominated articles, {{Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/name of nominated article/archiveN}}, filling in the exact name of the nominated article and the archive number N. Click on "Save page".
  5. Notify relevant parties by adding {{subst:FARMessage|ArticleName|alt=FAR subpage}} (for example, {{subst:FARMessage|Superman|alt=Superman/archive1}}) to relevant talk pages (insert article name). Relevant parties include main contributors to the article (identifiable through article stats script), the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status (identifiable through the Featured Article Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified). The message at the top of the FAR should indicate who you have notified.