| Revision as of 17:11, 10 August 2009 editA Nobody (talk | contribs)53,000 edits →Hapes Consortium: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:32, 13 August 2009 edit undoJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits →Hapes Consortium: <del>Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ::And, just to check -- what with the license change and all, what's the rule-of-thumb about e.g. this article, which is a copy-and-paste I'm sure from Wookieepedia (another CCASAL site)? --] (]) 03:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | ::And, just to check -- what with the license change and all, what's the rule-of-thumb about e.g. this article, which is a copy-and-paste I'm sure from Wookieepedia (another CCASAL site)? --] (]) 03:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *"]" is not a compelling reason for deletion. Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | *"]" is not a compelling reason for deletion. Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Non-Notable''' — ''delete.'' Cheers, ] 05:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:32, 13 August 2009
Hapes Consortium
- Hapes Consortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article about a non-notable fictional government from the Star Wars universe. The article's content appears to be a simple cut-and-paste from Wookieepedia. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Smerge/redirect to Star Wars galaxy#Political areas. This is a poorly executed copy-and-paste from Hapes Consortium, whose style conflicts with our fiction guidelines, on a topic which doesn't really meet Misplaced Pages notability standards for a stand-alone article in any case. Its list entry could use a bit of expansion and cleanup though, hence the "smerge". BryanG (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - no real-world significance whatsoever. There might be a list of political groups or somesuch in the Wikiproject -- but this topic certainly does not warrant inclusion here. --EEMIV (talk) 23:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- And, just to check -- what with the license change and all, what's the rule-of-thumb about e.g. this article, which is a copy-and-paste I'm sure from Wookieepedia (another CCASAL site)? --EEMIV (talk) 03:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- "Non-notable" is not a compelling reason for deletion. Best, --A Nobody 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Non-Notable — delete. Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)