| Revision as of 17:43, 12 August 2009 editMarskell (talk | contribs)22,422 edits rv to long-standing← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:12, 13 August 2009 edit undoTpbradbury (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,274 edits nomination template has been updatedNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| '''Featured article review''' (FAR) | '''Featured article review''' (FAR) | ||
| *In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". The aim is to improve articles rather than to demote them. Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies. The ideal review would address the issues raised and close with no change in status. | *In this step, possible improvements are discussed without declarations of "keep" or "delist". The aim is to improve articles rather than to demote them. Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies. The ideal review would address the issues raised and close with no change in status. | ||
| *Reviews can improve articles in various ways: |
*Reviews can improve articles in various ways: articles may need updating, formatting, and general copyediting. More complex issues, such as a failure to meet current standards of prose, comprehensiveness, factual accuracy, and neutrality, may also be addressed. | ||
| *The featured article director, ], or his delegates ], ] and ], determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and |
*The featured article director, ], or his delegates ], ] and ], determine either that there is consensus to close during this first stage, or that there is insufficient consensus to do so and so therefore the nomination should be moved to the second stage. | ||
| '''Featured article removal candidate''' (FARC) | '''Featured article removal candidate''' (FARC) | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| Nominators typically assist in the process of improvement; they may post only one nomination at a time, should not nominate articles that are ] (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content. | Nominators typically assist in the process of improvement; they may post only one nomination at a time, should not nominate articles that are ] (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content. | ||
| # Place <nowiki>{{subst:FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page". | # Place <nowiki>{{subst:FAR}}</nowiki> at the top of the talk page of the nominated article. Write "FAR listing" in the edit summary box. Click on "Save page". | ||
| # From |
# From the FAR template, click on the red "initiate the review" link. You will see pre-loaded information; please leave that text. | ||
| ⚫ | # Below the preloaded title, write which users and projects you'll notify (see step 5 below), and your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the ] that are at issue, then click on "Save page". | ||
| # Place <nowiki> ===]=== </nowiki> at the top of the subpage. | |||
| ⚫ | # Below |
||
| # , and place your nomination at the top of the list of nominated articles, <nowiki>{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/name of nominated article/archiveN}}</nowiki>, filling in the exact name of the nominated article and the archive number N. Click on "Save page". | # , and place your nomination at the top of the list of nominated articles, <nowiki>{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/name of nominated article/archiveN}}</nowiki>, filling in the exact name of the nominated article and the archive number N. Click on "Save page". | ||
| # Notify relevant parties by adding <nowiki>{{subst:FARMessage|ArticleName|alt=FAR subpage}}</nowiki> (for example, <nowiki>{{subst:FARMessage|Superman|alt=Superman/archive1}}</nowiki>) to relevant talk pages (insert article name). Relevant parties include main contributors to the article (identifiable through ), the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status (identifiable through the Featured Article Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified). |
# Notify relevant parties by adding <nowiki>{{subst:FARMessage|ArticleName|alt=FAR subpage}}</nowiki> (for example, <nowiki>{{subst:FARMessage|Superman|alt=Superman/archive1}}</nowiki>) to relevant talk pages (insert article name). Relevant parties include main contributors to the article (identifiable through ), the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status (identifiable through the Featured Article Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified). The message at the top of the FAR should indicate who you have notified. | ||
| |} | |} | ||
Revision as of 13:12, 13 August 2009
|
Reviewing featured articles Shortcuts
This page is for the review and improvement of featured articles that may no longer meet the featured article criteria. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted. There are two stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute. Featured article review (FAR)
Featured article removal candidate (FARC)
Each stage typically lasts two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list. Older reviews are stored in the archive. A bot will update the article talk page after the review is closed and moved to archives; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the {{FAR}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates {{articlehistory}}. |
Featured article candidates (FAC): Featured article review (FAR): Today's featured article (TFA):
Featured article tools:
Toolbox |
|
Nominating an article for FAR Nominators typically assist in the process of improvement; they may post only one nomination at a time, should not nominate articles that are featured on the main page (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.
| |